Skip navigation
sponsored by 

Iraq clashes subside, but militia still intact

Reportedly with Iran's help, al-Sadr survives U.S.-backed bid to crush him

IMAGE: DAMAGE IN SADR CITY
Karim Kadim / AP
Fighting between Muqtada al-Sadr followers and Iraqi-U.S. forces subsided enough Monday for residents of the Baghdad suburb of Sadr City to check out damage after nearly a week of clashes.
Slide show
Clashes Continue Between Mahdi Army and Iraqi Forces
  Violence and mourning
Fighting erupts between Shiite fighters loyal to Muqtada al-Sadr and U.S. and Iraqi forces in Baghdad and Basra.

more photos

Video
  Al-Sadr steps in
March 30: Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr has ordered his fighters off Iraqi streets, a possible breakthrough following a week of intense fighting. NBC’s Ned Colt reports.

Nightly News

Conflict in Iraq video  
Deadly mosque bombings
Oct. 2: At least 16 people are dead after a pair of bombings target Shiite worshippers celebrating at Baghdad mosques. Msnbc.com's Dara Brown reports.

Interactive
Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political powerplays in this virtual tour led by NBC’s Richard Engel.
updated 6:33 p.m. ET March 31, 2008

BAGHDAD - Rockets fell on the Green Zone and random machine gun fire rang out Monday in the southern city of Basra as Shiite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr sought to rein in his militia after a week of battles that claimed about 400 lives.

The peace deal between al-Sadr and Iraqi government forces — said to have been brokered in Iran — calmed the violence but left the cleric’s Mahdi Army intact and Iraq’s U.S.-backed prime minister politically battered and humbled within his own Shiite power base.

Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki had promised to crush the militias that have effectively ruled Basra for nearly three years. The U.S. military launched air strikes in the city to back the Iraqi effort.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

But the ferocious response by the Mahdi Army, including rocket fire on the U.S.-controlled Green Zone and attacks throughout the Shiite south, caught the government by surprise and sent officials scrambling for a way out of the crisis.

The confrontation enabled al-Sadr to show that he remains a powerful force capable of challenging the Iraqi government, the Americans and mainstream Shiite parties that have sought for years to marginalize him. And the outcome cast doubt on President Bush’s assessment that the Basra battle was “a defining moment” in the history “of a free Iraq.”

With gunmen again off the streets, a round-the-clock curfew imposed in Baghdad last week was lifted at 6 a.m. Monday, except in Sadr City and two other Shiite neighborhoods. Streets of the capital buzzed with traffic and commerce.

Several rockets or mortars slammed Monday into the Green Zone, the nerve center of the American mission in Iraq. But the U.S. Embassy said there no reports of serious injuries. At least two Americans working for the U.S. government were killed in Green Zone attacks last week.

An American soldier was killed Monday by a roadside bomb in northeastern Baghdad, the U.S. military said without specifying whether the attack occurred in a Shiite or Sunni area. The military also said a U.S. soldier wounded south of Baghdad on March 23 died Sunday in Germany.

U.S. Defense Secretary Robert Gates said in Copenhagen, Denmark, that the violence in Shiite areas had not changed American plans to withdraw more combat forces this spring.

McCain surprised by al-Maliki strategy
Republican Sen. John McCain, who has linked his presidential campaign to the conduct of the war, said he was “surprised” that al-Maliki had ordered an operation in Basra rather than keeping the focus on fighting al-Qaida in Iraq in the northern city of Mosul.

Fighting in the south helped make March the deadliest month for Iraqis since last summer, according to figures compiled by The Associated Press.

At least 1,247 Iraqis, including civilians and security personnel, had been killed as of Monday, according to figures compiled from police and U.S. military reports. The figure was nearly double the tally for February and the biggest monthly toll since August, when 1,956 people died violently.

In ordering his militia to stop fighting, al-Sadr also demanded concessions from the Iraqi government, including an end to the “illegal raids and arrests” of his followers and the release of all detainees who have not been convicted of any offenses.

Government spokesman Ali al-Dabbagh welcomed al-Sadr’s decision but told reporters Monday that no political group was above the law. Al-Sadr’s supporters believed the security crackdown in Basra was aimed at weakening their movement before provincial elections this fall.

U.S. and Iraqi officials insisted the operation was directed at criminals and rogue militiamen — some allegedly linked to Iran — but not against the Sadrist movement, which controls 30 of the 275 seats in the national parliament.

Iran reportedly played key role
But well-informed Iraqi political officials said the Iranians played a key role in hammering out the peace deal, boosting the Islamic Republic’s influence among the majority Shiite community. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because of the sensitivity of the information.

According to one Shiite official, the deal was struck after hours of negotiations in the Iranian holy city of Qom involving key figures in Iraq’s major Shiite parties and representatives of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard.

Two of the Iraqis present — Ali Adeeb and Hadi al-Amri — presented documents and photos which they claimed proved that al-Sadr’s militia was receiving Iranian weapons, the official said.

Shiite-dominated Iran is believed to supply weapons, money and training to most Iraqi Shiite factions — a charge the Iranians deny.

The Iraqi officials would not elaborate on Iran’s role, and efforts to contact Iraqi representatives who took part in the Qom meetings were unsuccessful.

Iran has been eager to maintain unity among Iraq’s factious Shiites, believing that is the best way to ensure a pro-Iranian government in Baghdad.

“By all reports, Iran’s role is not good,” said Michael O’Hanlon, foreign policy expert at the Brookings Institution. “They’re arming all groups. ...They want influence with everyone.”


Sponsored links

Resource guide

Get Your 2008 Credit Score

Find a business to start

Try for Free

Search Jobs

Find Your Dream Home

$7 trades, no fee IRAs

Find your next car