Judge calls Mills ‘explosive and volatile’

Related stories

Madonna reportedly talking to divorce lawyer

The judge did not, however, punish Mills for reportedly dumping a glass of water on McCartney’s lawyer, Fiona Shackleton, in the final hours of the hearing Monday. Shackleton, who represented Prince Charles in his divorce from Princess Diana, emerged with wet hair from the hearing, and Mills joked she had been “baptized” in court.

Still, the ruling gave a sympathetic description of Mills’ childhood, describing how she left home when she was 15 and supported herself with various jobs, beginning work as a model at 17 and soon finding jobs as a television anchor.

The judge also recounted how McCartney, still grieving the loss of his first wife Linda, wore the wedding ring she gave him throughout the early years of his romance with Mills and only removed it when he married Mills.

Story continues below ↓

The 58-page ruling offered an unprecedented public airing of McCartney’s finances — and showed just how far the former Beatle has come since his early days in Liverpool, when the band dreamed of someday scoring a top-10 hit.

McCartney has long been rumored to be pop’s first billionaire. Accounts unveiled Tuesday show him to be short of that goal, but still worth in the neighborhood of $800 million, with choice real estate holdings and an art collection of Picassos, Monets and other masters.

In classic British understatement, the judge described McCartney as someone who “composes, sings and plays musical instruments.”

He wrote how McCartney and his first wife, Linda, lived fairly modestly on Blossom Wood Farm in the village of Peasmarsh for many years and also had a property in London.

In the late 1990s, the judge said, the singer had properties in New York and on Long Island, as well as British properties in Rye, Somerset, Icklesham, Essex and Merseyside.

The judge said it was impossible to put a precise figure on McCartney’s vast financial empire, but said he believed it was worth about $800 million, far less than the $1.6 billion Mills claimed.

“There is absolutely no evidence at all to support that figure, or any figure anywhere near it,” he said.

Among McCartney’s holdings is real estate valued at about $68 million, bank accounts with more than $30 million, investments worth more than $68 million, and paintings, furniture, jewelry, horses and other assets valued at more than $64 million.

McCartney projected his net income for the year to be more than $10.6 million, the judge said.

In a statement to the court, McCartney said much of his current income comes from touring and that while his recent recordings have been well-received by critics, they have not been commercially successful.

He also said he does not have “day to day” control over many of his businesses, but is consulted on key decisions. He said the value of the music copyrights he holds has increased substantially, adding to his net worth.

He also said he wanted to keep all of his art collection because the works were collected before his marriage to Mills.

The court documents said Mills had an appraisal done of the collection that concluded it was worth $140 million, a valuation McCartney rejected. Mills also maintained McCartney gave her 30 of his paintings, an assertion he denied.

“I accept the husband’s evidence,” the judge said. “In my judgment he is entitled to have them back.”

< Prev | 1 | 2