Who has the larger coattails?
Is Democrat's win in Illinois due to Obama or a damaged GOP brand
Video |
Why it’s an uphill battle for McCain March 9: The presumptive GOP nominee has over half a year to gear up for the general election, but with fewer Republican voters turning out– and an unpopular president and war -- he may need all the time he can get. NBC’s Savannah Guthrie reports. Nightly News |
National Journal |
The Almanac of American Politics 2008 includes profiles of every member of Congress and up-to-date information on all 50 states and 435 House districts. |
|
Sure, Illinois is Obama's home state, and Oberweis was a flawed candidate who carried high disapproval ratings even among Republicans. And there's no evidence that Obama won the race for Foster, who was ahead in polling even before the ad went up. Even so, the fact that a first-time Democratic candidate would run in a district that President Bush carried with 55 percent in 2004, while at the same time boasting of a potential Democratic nominee's support, is a departure from conventional thinking. Candidates in Foster's situation usually avoid mentioning -- and often run away from -- the top of the ticket. Now Obama has good reason to crow about his coattails credibility.
Just as worrisome for Republicans should be the fact that their tried-and-true "tax-and-spend liberal" attack fell flat against Foster. Again, the credibility of the messenger (and the opponent) is important. But if Republicans can't win suburban/exurban districts by touting their fiscal discipline, it suggests a deeply damaged GOP brand -- and bigger problems ahead for GOP House candidates.
The question, of course, is whether having McCain at the top of the ticket will ultimately help recalibrate voter attitudes toward the party. Today, Bush remains the head of the party in the minds of most voters. Even so, it's fair to question the relevance of 2004 results in evaluating the competitiveness of a district. In a "normal" election, it'd be fair for candidates to write off districts carried by the opposing party's presidential nominee by 55 percent or more. But in this political environment, it's probably fair to knock 3 to 5 percentage points off of Bush's 2004 showing. In other words, treat a district that Bush carried with 53 percent as one he just narrowly carried with 50 percent or narrowly lost with 48 percent. Currently, 34 Republican incumbents sit in districts that Bush carried with 55 percent of the vote or less.
|
For example, in the ABC/Post poll, Obama beats McCain in general election matchups by a larger margin than Clinton (12 points to 6 points), but both carry independents by roughly the same margin. Clinton took 50 percent of independents, while Obama carried 49 percent. The reason for Obama's bigger margin overall? His stronger showing among Republicans. He took 16 percent of Republicans while Clinton was supported by just 9 percent. However, it's dangerous to assume that these Republicans are going to stick with Obama once the fall campaign begins in earnest.
This makes the coattails argument even more important for Obama. Not so long ago, many Democrats thought having Clinton at the top of the ticket would hurt their chances at making big gains downballot. The presence of so many red-state legislators on Obama's endorsement list is a testament to this concern. Yet now, given the huge number of GOP retirements, NRCC funding woes, and Foster's victory last weekend, the undercard argument may not carry the same punch.
In fact, the question now is whether the Ill.-14 loss will discourage more potential GOP challengers and encourage even more retirements. While filing deadlines have passed in many big states (California, Illinois, Ohio and Pennsylvania), some notable states remain, including New York (where Democrats have three freshmen) and Florida.
|
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM NATIONAL JOURNAL |
Sponsored links
Resource guide





