Effort made to restore photography’s credibility

Lawyers and juries ultimately have to consider circumstances beyond the image itself, Cherry said. For example, was the evidence available at the time of the dispute or did it suddenly show up six months later — giving that person time to manufacture it?

Researchers stand by their techniques.

"There will always be a countermeasure that cannot be prevented," said Jessica Fridrich, a professor at Binghamton University. "We are trying to make it harder for people who want to do these things to go unnoticed, undetected."

The key, she said, is to use tools in combination. A criminal or hoaxer might be sophisticated enough to defeat one technique, but not all at once.

Fridrich's research takes advantage of the fact that all cameras have tiny flaws, so small they don't affect what the eye can see. For example, her software could analyze a set of photographs taken by the same camera and notice that a certain, defective pixel is always dark. Seeing that pixel light up would suggest an alteration.

Dartmouth College professor Hany Farid, meanwhile, has developed a set of software tools he collectively calls Q-IF. He sells the programs for up to $25,000 a year.

One tool looks for the use of clone stamp, a feature for duplicating or erasing objects in an image. Two cloned flowers would appear identical and lack expected blemishes.

Another exploits how cameras capture color images. Color is a mixture of red, green and blue. Rather than have sensors that detect all three for each pixel, they generally alternate in a specific pattern. That pattern gets disrupted with airbrushing.

Other techniques include looking for inconsistencies in lighting and shadows.

A human still must make a final determination, and Farid admits he can never be certain. His techniques got challenged in one criminal case, and prosecutors withdrew him as an expert witness.

"If we don't find traces of tampering, we don't say it's real," Farid said. "We say we find no traces of tampering. That's the best we can say."

Nonetheless, his tools are innovative enough to pique the interest of Adobe, which is subsidizing his research.

Photoshop already has a logging feature, which can track and record every change made along the way — standard procedure these days in law enforcement.

"You have an audit trail, even if you have gone in and made changes to the image," said Cynthia Baron, author of "Adobe Photoshop Forensics: Sleuths, Truths and Fauxtography."

Adobe has no specific release schedule, though, on tamper-detection tools. The worry is that these same tools can help hoaxers test whether their changes escape notice.

"One of the things we've got to tackle," Conner said, "is to figure out if we can put some of these features in without making it easier for people to thwart them."

MORE FROM TECH AND GADGETS

Tech and gadgets Section Front

Facebook to overhaul privacy structure Avoid flirty patients on Facebook, doctors told Google allows publishers to limit free content Facebook and MySpace ban N.Y. sex offenders Mellencamp to quit smoking, if Facebook helps No more one size-fits-all point-and-shooters ‘Black screen of death’ for some Windows users CrunchPad tablet: it's a goner before arrival Web site: Bankers seeking recession affairs Jackson beats Spears in year's Yahoo searches Tech and gadgets Section Front   Add Tech and gadgets headlines to your news reader: