In denial: Why file tax returns?
Recent Wesley Snipes case shows some people still fall for this scam
![]() Phelan M.ebenhack / Reuters With Wesley Snipes' recent conviction, the U.S. Justice Department made it clear that even action heroes have to file tax returns and pay their taxes. |
|
But while most of us get real and get on with it, such wishful thinking has turned into actions of denial by some would-be filers.
Whether the action consists of simply failing to file a return or entering nothing but zeros, it often owes its inspiration and justification to the tax denier movement. It is a movement that persists despite the faulty legal theories and strategies its promoters sell, not to mention the court convictions racked up by its followers.
“No tax protester [who ended up in court] has ever avoided their tax liability. Prison maybe, but they still end up owing the tax,” emphasizes Jay Adkisson, an attorney and editor of Quatloos.com, a Web site dedicated to exposing tax scams . “They also owe the cost of their legal defense, interest, penalties and often end up paying many times over the actual tax that was due,” he adds.
Actor Wesley Snipes recently demonstrated this point. With his recent conviction, the U.S. Justice Department made it clear that even action heroes have to file tax returns and pay their taxes. Snipes faces possible jail time and owes the government substantial amounts in back taxes and penalties. He escaped a more serious charge of deliberately defrauding the government because the jury felt that he had been victimized by promoters who led him down the path of denial.
What are the arguments these promoters sell in their seminars, books and disk sets that could possibly compel someone into denying they are subject to the U.S. income tax or the IRS’s authority to impose it?
Some of these arguments are Constitutional in nature:
- The Sixteenth Amendment, which ushered in the income tax, was not properly ratified.
- Filing a Form 1040 violates the Fifth Amendment right against self-incrimination.
- Form 1040 violates the Fourth Amendment right to privacy.
- The Thirteenth Amendment defends against involuntary servitude.
- The First Amendment allows for objections on moral or religious grounds.
Adkisson points out that since 1913, when income tax came into being, there has never been any serious debate about the constitutionality of the tax by any legal scholar. It appears to be an area of contention dominated by people selling tax avoidance strategies.
But, not all the avoidance arguments rely on interpretation of the U.S. Constitution. Among the many others are that:
- Only those living in the District of Columbia and U.S. territories have to pay federal taxes. Everyone else is a citizen of the state they live in, and therefore not subject to federal taxation.
- Wages are not income. They are received in exchange for labor, so there is really no taxable gain.
- African and Native Americans can claim a special tax credit as reparations for slavery or other oppressive treatment that nullifies their tax liability.
- Because Form 1040 lacks an OMB control number as required by the Paperwork Reduction Act, it is invalid.
The creativity of the tax denier movement led the IRS to publish a handbook on all the arguments people use to justify not filing a tax return or paying their fair share. It is 74 pages long. Understand that not only does the IRS supply the legal citations debunking each theory or strategy — including those listed above — it has substantial case law on its side.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM TAX TACTICS |
| Add Tax Tactics headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Open an Account Online Today! $7 Trades & Powerful Trading Tools.
www.scottrade.com
Resource guide


