Julie Christie, your Oscar statuette is calling
Fragile beauty from ‘Away From Me’ turned in a subtle, lovely performance
Movie video |
Pattinson: Werewolves are ‘dorks’ Nov. 9: “New Moon” heartthrob Robert Pattinson takes a bite out of werewolves, explaining why vampires are so much cooler in “The Twilight Saga.” Plus, how does he feel about werewolves walking around shirtless all the time? |
Slideshow |
November movies The “Twilight” sequel, “New Moon” hits the big screen, along with George Clooney in “The Men Who Stare at Goats” and “Fantastic Mr. Fox” and the apocalyptic “2012” and “The Road.” more photos |
|
In what’s shaping to be a very grim year thematically, the best actress race offers slightly more levity, if only because “Juno” is such a charming comedy and “The Savages” offers some laughs to go with its familial angst and midlife disappointments. After a steady diet of “There Will Be Blood” and “No Country for Old Men,” Academy voters will no doubt take their respite where they can get it.
The nominated actresses this year represent an interesting mix of former winners and nominees alongside first-timers, Europeans and North Americans, youngsters and screen legends, real-life characters and fictional ones. In tandem, they represent some of the most exciting performers in contemporary cinema. But only one gets to win.
Predicted winner: Julie Christie
![]() |
Lionsgate / Lionsgate |
But it’s the work that really matters, and Christie’s moving turn in Sarah Polley’s “Away from Her” is a standout in an already extraordinary career. Playing a Canadian wife losing her memories to Alzheimer’s and dementia, the former It Girl of Swinging London creates poignancy without wallowing in bathos and proves that, more than 40 years after “Doctor Zhivago,” her fragile beauty continues to bewitch movie lovers. While “mental illness” is up there with “crazy prostitute” and “pretty actress in ugly makeup” as catnip for Oscar voters, Christie’s fourth nominated performance is subtle and low-key, and all the more heartbreaking for it.
Cate Blanchett
![]() |
Universal |
|
On top of that, her nominations this year for “E: TGA” and “I’m Not There” (if she wins this year, it will probably be for the latter) mean that four of her five Oscar nods have been for playing real people. All of that should be good for a footnote in Oscar trivia books; let’s just hope that it’s not impetus for another disappointing “Elizabeth” sequel.
Marion Cotillard
![]() |
New Line Cinema |
Apart from a small role in “Big Fish,” however, Cotillard herself has been an unknown quantity in the U.S., even though she’s worked a lot in her native France. Not getting to accept her Golden Globe on TV may have worked against her, because to see Cotillard in person is to appreciate the total transformation she underwent to play the character. Even though you see Piaf age decades in the film, growing from hard-luck teen to physically devastated diva, the difference between Cotillard in person and Cotillard in “La Vie en Rose” is substantial, and heaven knows the Academy appreciates acting you can quantify. That’s why lovelies like Theron and Halle Berry get taken seriously the minute they smudge the dirt on their face; Academy voters can hold their hands apart and say, “She’s acting THIS MUCH.”
The foreign-language hurdle makes it a toughie for Cotillard, however, since the last woman to win a best actress Oscar without speaking English was Sophia Loren, for 1961’s “Two Women.” But even if Cotillard goes home empty-handed on Feb. 24, she’s already attracted the attention of American casting agents who, with any luck, will guide her toward projects that will once again attract the Academy’s attention.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM ACADEMY AWARDS |
| Add Academy Awards headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide







