Stark differences in candidates’ economic plans

Giuliani rebukes 'nanny government approach'
Rudolph W. Giuliani, the former mayor of New York City, has not released a plan to deal specifically with the current slowdown. But Mr. Giuliani pointedly ridiculed the more activist approaches of Mrs. Clinton and other Democratic contenders.

“It’s a typical central government approach, a nanny government approach,” Mr. Giuliani told supporters at a rally on Monday in Naples, Fla.

Mr. Giuliani, like most of his Republican rivals, would make all of Mr. Bush’s tax cuts permanent. He would also reduce the corporate tax rate, to 25 percent from 35 percent, and reduce the tax rate on capital gains.

Mr. Giuliani’s advisers acknowledged on Monday that those ideas were not tailored to the current evidence of a looming economic downturn. Making Mr. Bush’s tax cuts permanent would have no immediate effect on the economy, because the tax cuts are set to remain in force until the end of 2010.

Reducing corporate and capital gains taxes would do little immediately to benefit people who have lost their jobs, and many economists argue that tax cuts will have the most short-term stimulative impact if they are aimed at people most in need.

But David R. Malpass, an economic adviser to Mr. Giuliani, said the goal was to create the best conditions for investment.

“The mayor’s view is that the best economic recovery package is something that’s lasting,” Mr. Malpass said. “It’s not giving cash back to people, but creating a better environment for growth.”

Douglas Holtz-Eakin, Mr. McCain’s top economic adviser, expressed a similar skepticism about government efforts to fine tune the economy. “The track record of the government trying to time these things is not good,” Mr. Holtz-Eakin said.

Dems press for wholesale reform
The Democratic contenders are far more eager than Republicans to propose economic-rescue measures. Democrats are also willing to waive temporarily their insistence on fiscal discipline, a cornerstone of Mrs. Clinton’s long-term approach.

Appearing Sunday on “Meet the Press” on NBC, Mrs. Clinton bluntly declared that a stimulus package should be allowed to increase the federal deficit temporarily because it is intended to inject additional money into the economy.

There are differences between some of the Democratic plans. Mrs. Clinton and Mr. Obama have proposed plans that could ultimately cost $110 billion. The Clinton plan relies heavily on government spending, and the Obama plan would rely more heavily on temporary tax breaks.

Mr. Obama would provide an immediate tax rebate of $250 to workers and would pay an extra $250 to every person collecting Social Security benefits. If unemployment increases three months in a row, he would pay an extra $250 to workers and retirees.

More from NYTimes.com Business Cool Toward McCain’s Health Coverage Plan Obama’s Personal Ties Are Subject of Program on Fox G.O.P. Query Involves 1% of Giving to Obama   Video: Road to November Runs Through Greeley, Colo. External links

Mr. Obama’s plan would also provide $10 billion to help homeowners avoid foreclosure, $10 billion to states that are hardest hit by the downturn and $10 billion to extend unemployment benefits to more people, including temporary workers and self-employed long-time unemployed workers.

Austin Goolsbee, Mr. Obama’s top economic adviser, said the payments represented the fastest way of getting money to people who are most likely to need it and to spend it quickly.

Mr. Edwards and Mrs. Clinton have proposed plans to channel more money to government programs. Mr. Edwards would put money into building “clean energy” public works. Mrs. Clinton would put $30 billion into an “emergency housing crisis fund” and $25 billion into helping low-income people pay heating bills.

Jeff Zeleny contributed reporting from Reno, Nev., and Michael Cooper from Florida.

Picking the president: The candidates Click to visit that candidate’s msnbc.com page or click the XML symbol for an RSS feed. John McCain    Barack Obama

MORE FROM THE NEW YORK TIMES

The New York Times Section Front

NYT: States' purges of voter rolls appear illegal NYT: Campaigns shift to attack mode NYT: McCain, Obama sharply divided on Iraq NYT: Election divides Catholic Church NYT: Crossed paths of Obama, ’60s bomber NYT: Polls show Obama has significant lead NYT: Palin confident, but often vague NYT: Biden often tripped by spontaneity NYT: Concerns grow about Palin's readiness NYT: McCain on attack after deal collapse The New York Times Section Front