Zoo could face charges, fines in tiger attack
Expert says low wall may have allowed tiger to scale wall
![]() Noah Berger / AP The tiger enclosure at the San Francisco Zoo sits empty on Wednesday following the deadly Christmas Day tiger attack. |
Video |
Zoos examine safety measures As police continue to investigate the S.F. Zoo, zoos from the Bronx to L.A. are scrutinizing their tiger habitats to ensure similar tragedies don't strike again. NBC's Peter Alexander reports. Nightly News |
SAN FRANCISCO - SAN FRANCISCO — The deadly tiger escape at the San Francisco Zoo could prove to be a costly blow to an institution that has come under fire repeatedly in just the past few years over the deaths of two elephants and the mauling of a zookeeper.
It is becoming increasingly clear that 350-pound Siberian tiger that killed a teenager and severely mauled two other visitors in a Christmas Day rampage climbed over a wall that at 12 1/2 feet was about 4 feet below the minimum recommended for U.S. zoos by the Association of Zoos and Aquariums.
Ron Tilson, a top U.S. tiger expert and the association official responsible for the recommendation, told Reuters in a telephone interview that a Siberian tiger like the one at the San Francisco Zoo could scale such a wall.
"I've seen tigers, big male tigers, reach up to 12 feet high," said Tilson, also the Minnesota Zoo's conservation director.
Tilson said the female Siberian at the San Francisco Zoo may have jumped to latch its front paws on the lip of the exhibit's wall. That would have provided enough support for the powerful 350-pound cat to push itself up the concrete wall with its hind legs, Tilson said.
"I could understand how this female got her paws up and then just scrambled up," he said.
Accreditation suspended in 2005
Zoo officials said at a brief press conference Friday that they plan to reopen the facility Jan. 3, but they did not say whether the tiger exhibit would also be open. Also, San Francisco police Chief Heather Fong said that an investigation has determined there was no intentional release of the animal though she didn't elaborate on how it may have gotten out.
But now the zoo could face heavy fines from regulators. It could be stripped of its exhibitor license. Its accreditation could be at risk. It could be hit with a huge lawsuit by the victims or their families. It could even face criminal charges, depending on what the investigation finds.
"All this legal action is likely to impact the financial viability of the zoo," said Rory Little, a professor at the University of California's Hastings College of the Law. "Whether the zoo can stay open is a big question."
Click for related content |
The Association of Zoos and Aquariums, which typically accredits zoos every five years, has released statements this week in support of the zoo.
The association, however, has declined to renew the zoo's accreditation before. In January 2005, the zoo lost its accreditation after a three-day inspection found a number of operational and maintenance problems. The zoo eventually received full accreditation in March 2006 after the AZA found the problems had been corrected.
San Francisco Zoo Director Manuel Mollinedo said the AZA never noted any deficiencies with the wall around the tiger enclosure.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture's Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, which is responsible for enforcing the Animal Welfare Act, also could impose penalties, including fines, or suspend or revoke the zoo's exhibitor license if it is found that the zoo violated federal regulations on animal enclosures. Mollinedo said Thursday inspectors from the department had visited the zoo.
Legal experts said lawsuits are also likely. Already, the zoo is facing a lawsuit by zookeeper Lori Komejan, who was attacked last year when she fed the same tiger involved in the deadly escape. The animal mauled her arm.
In October, Komejan sued the city of San Francisco, seeking compensation for lost wages, medical expenses and emotional distress. She accused the city, which owns the zoo property, of "housing the tigers with reckless disregard for the safety of animal handlers and members of the general public."
![]() |
The California Division of Occupational Health and Safety issued a report that found the zoo at fault for Komejan's injuries. The report said zoo officials knew the big-cat exhibit posed a hazard because the animals could reach under the cage bars. The agency fined the zoo $18,000 and ordered safety improvements.
The zoo added customized steel mesh over the bars, built in a feeding chute and increased the distance between the public and the cats.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
- Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM U.S. NEWS |
| Add U.S. news headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide





