McCain assails Obama for lack of experience

Tom Curry National affairs writer • Profile • E-mail

WASHINGTON -

Add Republican presidential hopeful Sen. John McCain to the list of Sen. Barack Obama’s rivals who are suggesting that he lacks the experience required to be president.

In a speech in Des Moines, Iowa, on Tuesday, Obama pledged that he would “remove our combat brigades from Iraq and increase our military, political, and economic commitment to Afghanistan" as president.

Asked Tuesday night about Obama’s comments, McCain got in a slap about his opponent's slender foreign policy credentials, although he also included other Democrats in his critique as lacking “judgment.”

“They don’t understand the implications of failure in Iraq: that it will directly affect Afghanistan and the entire Middle East,” McCain said. “They simply either don’t have the experience or that judgment to understand that. If we fail in Iraq, the consequences of defeat will spread throughout the region.”

“They all take simple views,” McCain said of the Democratic contenders. “Sen. Obama and the others wanted to threaten (Pakistani leader Pervez) Musharraf with cutting off aid. We didn’t want threaten to cut off aid; we wanted to work with him and get him to make the progress that he is making.”

McCain cites 'experience and judgment'
He added, “That’s the difference between (having) experience and judgment — and not having it.”

McCain has served in the Congress since 1983, first in the House, and, since 1987, in the Senate. Obama has served in the Senate since 2005.

Video   McCain on fire Dec. 19: Republican presidential contender Sen. John McCain talks to Hardball’s Chris Matthews about his campaign. Hardball

Obama campaign spokeswoman Jen Psaki said, “John McCain supported taking our focus off of al Qaida and invading Iraq; Barack Obama opposed the war. John McCain wants to continue an open-ended commitment of our troops to Iraq; Barack Obama will end the war and provide more troops in Afghanistan."

Psaki also said McCain "wants to give President Musharraf a blank check; Barack Obama wants a Pakistan policy that is focused on results. That’s the difference between the failed foreign policy of the Bush-Cheney years, and Obama’s judgment to lead.”

Obama’s argument is a familiar staple of Democratic rhetoric on Capitol Hill.

On Monday night, the Democratic-controlled House OK'd a bill providing $30 billion for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan, but nothing for Iraq.

It was a good snapshot of Democratic “out of Iraq, shift to Afghanistan” sentiment since 201 out of the 231 House Democrats voted for it.

However on Wednesday the House gave in to pressure from the Senate and passed $70 billion in funds for both Afghanistan and Iraq operations.

Seventy-eight Democrats voted for the Afghanistan-Iraq funds while 141 Democrats voted "no."

Only one Republican voted against the funds, while 194 voted "yes."

“Afghanistan is the primary front of the fight against Islamic extremism, but for too long we have taken our eye off the ball,” argued the House Democrats’ leader on military policy, Armed Services Committee chairman Rep. Ike Skelton last week.

Skelton said, “I am afraid that if we do not reallocate some resources from Iraq to Afghanistan, we risk two strategic failures, not just one.”

Skelton said Monday that he was “encouraged by reports that suggest the Administration may be listening to calls for an increased focus on Afghanistan and is considering a range of steps to stop the deterioration of security conditions in the country.”

Echoes of the 2004 debate
And if all this has a déjà vu feeling to it, it shouldn’t be surprising.

In his first debate with President Bush in 2004, Democratic presidential nominee Sen. John Kerry assailed the president for “diverting your attention from the real war on terror in Afghanistan against Osama bin Laden and taking if off to Iraq.”

But even as Obama and other Democratic leaders continue to make an Afghanistan pitch similar to the one that Kerry made four years ago, the strategic picture has become more muddled recently.

Some congressional Democrats who specialize in military policy say the situation in Iraq is improving, while conditions in Afghanistan are deteriorating.

Armed Services Committee member Rep. Gene Taylor, D- Miss., who has just returned from a trip to Iraq, said Tuesday, “I’ve got to admit, I’m guardedly optimistic about what’s happening in Iraq. I was just there this last weekend."

He added, "Let’s face it: the casualties, thank goodness, are down. We have, for a number of reasons, gotten more support from amongst the Iraqi leaders not necessary the elected leaders, but the sheiks.”

MORE FROM POLITICS

Politics Section Front

Obama rejects idea of 2nd stimulus Obama heralds Africa’s ‘moment of promise’ NYT: Ghana visit points to Africa's instability Obama's visit to fort a 'full-circle experience' House Dems to tax rich for health care Obama considers bailout for small business Sept. may bring push for Iran sanctions Congress asked to address racism in military Al-Qaida inmate accesses Obama's books Newsweek: How Obama looked past the Kremlin Politics Section Front   Add Politics headlines to your news reader: