‘Survivor’ student’s alliance, plans pay off

"You just stole a million dollars. Well played," professional poker player Jean-Robert said while casting his final vote for Todd Herzog, the winner of "Survivor: China."

Todd, whom host Jeff Probst noted was just 14 when the series debuted in 2000, has been a student of the game, and he proved that in his final Tribal Council appearance. He made a successful case for his victory, gaining the votes of even those he betrayed, such as Jean-Robert.

Having formed alliances with both Amanda and Courtney early in the game, Todd was up against them in the final three, but ultimately his transparency and persuasiveness — and their missteps — gave him the win by a vote of 4 to 2 to 1, with Courtney placing second.

Courtney essentially acknowledged that Todd was the better player. "I think airing Todd's dirty laundry is pretty redundant. I think he wears it on his sleeve. I think every single person here knows exactly every bad thing Todd's done, and that's why you're sitting over there," she said, admitting that "he might be deserving" of the $1 million.

When jury member Jaime cast her final vote, she told Todd, "You did not have my vote coming into this. I'm very impressed with your answers this evening, and that's why you got my vote."

Straightforward
That's because Todd gave coherent, straightforward answers about his game play. Many seasons of "Survivor" have been won in final Tribal Councils, when the eventual winner told members of the jury what they needed to hear to heal their wounds — or at least putting a bandage on them.

This time, the opposite happened. For the most part, Todd explained and apologized for the injuries he inflicted, while Amanda tried to hastily bandage hers but ended up opening brand-new wounds. (As Courtney acknowledged that she was "the longest shot to win" in part because of her "winning personality," she became the jury's back-up vote.)

Amanda, who won the last two immunity challenges and the final reward challenge, seemed to be in the strongest position going up against the jury. Extremely likable, she also proved herself to be an effective player who didn't irritate people like Todd tended to do.

But Amanda became defensive and stubborn when trying to explain her actions and couldn't make a compelling argument for her victory besides citing her rather smart strategy to get rid of James and his two immunity idols.

Her inability to elaborate on her game play was even more striking considering that  she and Todd entered into an alliance on day one, and thus on day 39, essentially had the exact same track record. The difference, however, was that Todd was able to both explain his moves and take credit for them, while Amanda was barely visible in his shadow.

Jury members may want the eventual winner to lie to them and inflate their egos, but they also don't want to lose to a player they perceive as weaker than themselves. Todd was that better player, and earned four votes as a result.

Perhaps his biggest sin came in recent weeks, when his successful game play and position of power led to arrogance. That almost cost him the game, never mind the respect he deserves for playing so smartly.

MORE FROM REALITY TV

Reality TV Section Front

Fang tribe takes turn for the dumb on 'Survivor' Hugh Hefner opens up about ‘Girls’ breakup   ‘Project Runway’ becomes a ‘drag’ strip Husband leaves so wife can stay on 'Loser' Non-elimination night keeps Rocco 'Dancing' May-Treanor has surgery on Achilles tendon Atlanta takes ‘Housewives’ to a new level Vote: You be the ‘Dancing’ judge The secrets of 'Survivor' revealed Television section Reality TV Section Front   Add Reality TV headlines to your news reader: