High court won't hear leaked Gingrich call case

updated 11:18 a.m. ET Dec. 3, 2007

WASHINGTON - The long legal fight between two members of Congress over an illegally taped telephone call ended Monday when the Supreme Court refused to review the case.

The court left in place a federal appeals court ruling that Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash., should not have given reporters access to the tape-recorded telephone call of Republican leaders discussing the House ethics case against former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, R-Ga, in December 1996.

McDermott asked the justices to hear his appeal of the May ruling, which he said infringed on his free speech rights. The court did not comment on its action.

The U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, in a 5-4 decision, said McDermott's offense was especially egregious since he was a senior member of the House ethics committee at the time.

The ruling upheld a previous decision ordering McDermott to pay House Minority Leader John Boehner, R-Ohio, more than $700,000 for leaking the taped conversation. The figure includes $60,000 in damages and more than $600,000 in legal costs.

Boehner was among several GOP leaders heard on the December 1996 call, which involved ethics allegations against Gingrich. Then the House speaker, Gingrich was heard on the call telling Boehner and others how to react to allegations. He was later fined $300,000 and reprimanded by the House.

McDermott, who was then serving on the ethics panel, leaked the tape to two newspapers, which published stories on the case in January 1997.

The case is McDermott v. Boehner, 07-439.

MORE FROM CAPITOL HILL

Capitol Hill Section Front

Parties jockey for an edge on economic aid Colin Powell calls Sen. Stevens' word 'sterling' U.S., India sign nuclear deal Bush wins ruling in prosecutors' case Bush signs financial bailout bill Scandal-plagued Jefferson moves to runoff Will bailout crimp Democrats' spending plans? Inquiry into fired prosecutors questioned Give me a break, a tax break — or else Let's do the numbers on the House re-vote Capitol Hill Section Front   Add Capitol Hill headlines to your news reader: