Skip navigation

Judge rejects ‘Roe v. Wade for Men’ lawsuit

Man: If women have right to choose, men should have right to deny support

Video: Life  
Leaving home for the war zone
Dec. 1: During his final days of training before deployment to Afghanistan, a soldier spends time with his family and fellow troops as he prepares to leave. NBC's Ron Mott reports.

  Photo features  
  More
Image: Girls stand in the mouth of a cat sculpture in central Kiev
Reuters
  The Week in Pictures
A starry night, cat’s mouth, a lighthouse stands tall, bear attack, a sea of balloons, H1N1 reaction and more news and feature photos from around the globe.
Image: A volunteer dressed as a cavewoman walks inside a cage at Warsaw Zoo
Reuters
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.
updated 4:58 p.m. ET Nov. 6, 2007

LANSING, Mich. - A federal appeals court has upheld the dismissal of a lawsuit nicknamed “Roe v. Wade for Men” filed by a men’s rights group on behalf of a man who said he shouldn’t have to pay child support for his ex-girlfriend’s daughter.

A three-judge panel of the 6th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, in a decision released Tuesday, agreed with a lower court judge that Matthew Dubay’s suit was frivolous.

Dubay, 25, had said ex-girlfriend Lauren Wells knew he didn’t want to have a child and assured him repeatedly she couldn’t get pregnant because of a medical condition.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

He argued that if a pregnant woman can choose among abortion, adoption or raising a child, a man involved in an unintended pregnancy should have the choice of declining the financial responsibilities of fatherhood.

U.S. District Judge David Lawson in Bay City disagreed, rejecting Dubay’s argument that Michigan’s paternity law violates the U.S. Constitution’s equal protection clause because it didn’t extend reproductive rights to men.

The suit was prepared for Dubay by the National Center for Men in Old Bethpage, N.Y., which dubbed it “Roe v. Wade for Men.” The nickname drew objections from women’s rights organizations.

State courts have ruled in the past that any inequity experienced by men like Dubay is outweighed by society’s interest in ensuring that children get financial support from two parents.

Dubay sued the Saginaw County prosecutor and Wells in March, contesting an order to pay $500 a month in child support for a girl born to Wells in 2005. Michigan Attorney General Mike Cox intervened in the case and argued for its dismissal.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide