Skip navigation

Wikipedia becomes a class assignment

Students edit, rewrite Wiki articles instead of producing term papers

  Tech Holiday Gift Guide  
  More
Holiday Retail
Top 10 Black Friday Web sites
Here's a list of Web sites you'll want to keep an eye on for Black Friday deals, so sync them across your computers with Chrome bookmarks, save them to delicious or just store them in your favorite browser.

  Real Women’s Guide to Technology

An MSN special that focuses on consumer technologies that can benefit women.

Tech and gadgets videos
Hot tech gifts
Nov. 29: The Washington Post's Rob Pegoraro gives Msnbc's Alex Witt a rundown of some of the hottest tech gifts for the holiday shopping season.

Video
Tech Watch
The latest in technology and entertainment news.
  Auto Tech

A better economy may lure buyers, but these trends could seal the deal.

Go to Auto Tech

updated 7:48 a.m. ET Nov. 1, 2007

SEATTLE - Some academics cringe when students turn to Wikipedia as a reference for term papers.

University of Washington-Bothell professor Martha Groom has more of an "If you can't beat 'em, join 'em" response to the online encyclopedia that anyone can write or edit.

Instead of asking students in her environmental history course to turn in one big paper at the end of the semester, she requires them either to write an original Wikipedia article or to do a major edit on an existing one.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The inspiration came to her as she prepared teaching materials for her class.

"I would find these things on Wikipedia," she said, and would think, "Gosh, this is awfully thin here. I wonder if my students could fill this in?"

Wikipedia has been vilified as a petri dish for misinformation, and the variable accuracy of its articles is a point Groom readily concedes. Since the advent of the Web, she said, the quality of sources students cite has deteriorated.

For her students, the Wikipedia experiment was "transformative," and students' writing online proved better than the average undergrad research paper.

Knowing their work was headed for the Web, not just one harried professor's eyes, helped students reach higher — as did the standards set by the volunteer "Wikipedians" who police entries for accuracy and neutral tone, Groom said.

The exercise also gave students a taste of working in the real world of peer-reviewed research.

Most of the articles were well received, but Groom said some students caught heat from Wikipedia editors for doing exactly what college students are trained to do: write an argumentative, critical essay.

"Some people were a little rude," she said of the anonymous Wikipedia editors. Ultimately, she had to teach the students the difference between good secondary research and the average college paper.

"You don't get to say that last little bit on, 'This is why this is the truth and the way,'" she said.

Copyright 2007 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Resource guide