NASA boss promises to reveal safety poll results

updated 8:23 p.m. ET Oct. 31, 2007

WASHINGTON - Abandoning its secrecy claims, NASA promised Congress on Wednesday it will reveal results of an unprecedented federal aviation survey which found that aircraft near collisions, runway interference and other safety problems occur far more often than previously recognized.

The agency’s chief also said, however, that before any release NASA would scrub the data to make sure none of the 24,000 pilots who were interviewed anonymously could be identified, taking until the end of the year to do what a survey expert told Congress could be done in a week.

Provoking broad criticism, NASA had said previously it was withholding the information because it feared it would upset air travelers and hurt airline profits. NASA cited those reasons in refusing to turn over the survey data to The Associated Press, which sought the information over 14 months under the Freedom of Information Act.

“We did say that, and that was the wrong thing to have said,” NASA’s administrator, Michael Griffin, testified during an oversight hearing. “I apologize. ... People make mistakes. This was a mistake.”

Lawmakers from both sides were harshly critical. Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., chairman of the House Science and Technology Committee, said NASA’s reasons for withholding the research were “both troubling and unconvincing.”

“This appears to be a mess of NASA’s own causing,” said Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis., the top Republican on the committee’s oversight and investigations panel. “You’ve dug yourself in a hole. I can’t say you’re not digging yourself deeper from what I’ve heard at this hearing.”
Griffin said his agency will release the research data that does not contain what he described as confidential commercial information. He said NASA spent $11.3 million on the research.

“The survey results we can legally release will be released, period,” he said.

Griffin’s end-of-the-year timetable wasn’t fast enough for some lawmakers.

MSNBC video   Air safety secrets Oct. 31:  Msnbc.com travel columnist Charlie Leocha talks about NASA's survey results being released to the public. MSNBC

“Shouldn’t it be a priority to your agency to scrub this and get this out to the public immediately?” asked Rep. Jerry Costello, D-Ill. He said NASA “made a huge mistake in how they responded to the AP and to the media.”

Another lawmaker, Rep. Harry Mitchell, D-Ariz., asked: “Why does it take a hearing in Congress and public pressure for a hearing to get this information made public?”

In an odd twist, Griffin raised doubts about the reliability of his own agency’s research by telling lawmakers that NASA does not consider the survey’s methodology or data to have been sufficiently verified.

Griffin confirmed NASA’s research project showed many types of safety incidents occurring more frequently than were reported by other U.S. government monitoring programs. But he cautioned that the data was never validated and warned, “There may be reason to question the validity of the methodology.”

Excursion Exam Test your smarts Test your travel IQ with the weekly quiz.

“We did not manage that project well,” he told Congress. “We will fix it and we will try not to do it again.”

“What I’m hearing you say is, we’ve just thrown $11 million down a rathole,” said Rep. Ben Chandler, D-Ky.

Deal of the Day Newfoundland and Labrador Explore World Heritage sites, glimpse into the life of the Vikings, more, from $1,635.

“I hope that is not the case, and I believe we should be able to get much that is useful from this data,” Griffin said. “But there will be cause to question it from knowledgeable aviation experts.”

Experts who worked on the study say it adhered to the highest survey industry standards. The research was “state of the art,” said Jon Krosnick, a Stanford University professor who helped create the survey questions. Disputing Griffin, Krosnick told Congress that aviation experts from NASA and the Federal Aviation Administration, and the White House Office of Management and Budget and other groups reviewed the research plans. He said further scrutiny would not have been helpful.

“These peer review processes rarely yielded significant changes in the survey process,” Krosnick said.

MORE FROM NEWS

News Section Front

Bride marries arriving groom at Texas airport   Train passengers stranded in N.Y., Northeast Airlines waive fees for storm-affected travelers Eurostar back in action after 4-day  shutdown Police react to unruly crowd at Delta terminal 10 years of twisted travel Snow, icy conditions snarl travel in Britain October highway travel off 0.5 percent from year ago Spanish airline is grounded Airlines may have trouble following DOT rules News Section Front   Add News headlines to your news reader: