Lieberman an unseen force in Democrats' clash
Connecticut maverick backs Clinton, criticizes Edwards on Iran policy
MSNBC video |
Clinton urges diplomacy with Iran Oct 30: At NBC’s debate Tuesday night, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., said she was against a push to go to war with Iran, arguing instead for diplomacy and economic sanctions. MSNBC |
NBC Video: Politics |
Obama security too loose? Nov. 30: Msnbc’s Ed Schultz and panel debate how the White House could have suffered a security breach and whether it could happen again. |
Slideshow |
more photos |
Four years ago, it was Lieberman up on stage during the debates with John Edwards and the other Democratic presidential hopefuls.
Now he is playing an important off-stage supporting role in the struggle for the 2008 nomination.
His amendment, co-sponsored by Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., urging President Bush to designate Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps as a terrorist organization has become a litmus test for the Democratic contenders.
Last month, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., voted for the Kyl-Lieberman amendment, joining 29 other Democrats and 47 Republicans as the Senate OK’d the non-binding statement.
Her vote triggered a fusillade of criticism from her rivals, former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C, and Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., who portrayed the vote as something Bush might exploit to justify an attack on Iran.
“She shouldn’t have done it, because what she’s done is given this president with his history the first step in the authority to move (militarily) on Iran,” Edwards told reporters last Friday in Boone, Iowa.
He hammered at that theme again in Tuesday night’s debate, charging that the Kyl-Lieberman resolution “looks literally like it was written by the neo-cons…. It literally gave Bush and Cheney exactly what they wanted.”
|
Lieberman is 'troubled'
Adopting a tone of sorrow and bewilderment, not anger, Lieberman said Tuesday before the debate that his and Kyl’s measure “ought to be non-controversial.”
He said the use of the resolution as a litmus test for Democrats “troubles me, as it troubled me when the amendment came up on the floor of the Senate that 22 senators voted against it.”
Among them: Democratic presidential contenders Sen. Chris Dodd of Connecticut and Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware. Obama missed that vote.
Lieberman explained, “I thought it was so direct, factual, based on evidence the U.S. military has given us of the involvement of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps in training and equipping Iraqi extremists who… have been responsible for the killing of hundreds of American soldiers.”
Chuckling a bit, apparently in disbelief, Lieberman asked, “How can you vote against a request that the administration impose economic sanctions on a group that the U.S. military has presented us ample evidence is a terrorist group killing American soldiers?”
Clinton 'not in favor of doing nothing'
On Tuesday night, Clinton explained her vote by saying, “I’m not in favor of this rush to war, but I’m also not in favor of doing nothing. Iran is seeking nuclear weapons and the Iran Revolutionary Guard is in the forefront of that, as they are in the sponsorship of terrorism.”
|
Lieberman acknowledged Tuesday that some senators don’t trust Bush, but said, “At some point, we’ve got to get over this distrust and partisanship.”
Thirty Democratic senators voted for the Kyl-Lieberman measure and thus, to some degree, they have gotten over that “distrust and partisanship.”
But Edwards and Obama are more sensitively attuned to the views of Democratic primary voters than are senators who aren’t running for president.
Magnifying their differences with Clinton is what Edwards and Obama think they must do to appeal to primary electorate, especially since the voting records of the three Democrats are identical in most respects.
|
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM POLITICS |
| Add Politics headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide






