Skip navigation

Long-term U.S. plan for Iraq may cost billions

Study finds a Korea-like presence would require up to $25 billion each year

Conflict in Iraq video  
Money talks for Blackwater in Iraq
Nov. 10: The New York Times reports that the Blackwater security company authorized secret payments to Iraqi officials to silence criticism. Rachel Maddow talks about these new revelations with Jeremy Scahill, reporter for The Nation.

  Timeline  
  
Image: Ayatollah Khomeini
AP file

The relationship is at center of world affairs and America's global interests

Interactive
Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political powerplays in this virtual tour led by NBC’s Richard Engel.
Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 2:48 p.m. ET Sept. 20, 2007

WASHINGTON - The cost of a long-term U.S. military presence in Iraq similar to the peacekeeping role American troops have played in South Korea would range from $10 billion to $25 billion a year, the Congressional Budget Office said Thursday.

A Korea-like presence of 55,000 troops would cost about $25 billion a year in a "combat" scenario similar to the current mission, the nonpartisan CBO said in a report.

Keeping the troops protected at established military bases and out of combat would lower the cost to about $10 billion annually. One-time costs for base construction or additional equipment could reach $8 billion, the CBO said.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Senate Budget Committee Chairman Kent Conrad, D-N.D., requested the study after President Bush likened America's future in Iraq to the peacekeeping role U.S. troops play in South Korea, where they have been stationed for some five decades.

Congress has already appropriated $412 billion for the Iraq mission, CBO says, with costs for operations there and in Afghanistan expected to require an almost $200 billion additional appropriation for the budget year beginning Oct. 1.

"The Bush administration has been trying to hide the cost of this war every step of the way," Conrad said. "Now the president is considering a significant ongoing presence in Iraq, long after he leaves office."

While it's plain long-term troop levels in Iraq will be determined by future presidents and Congresses, sentiment within the Bush administration is to station U.S. troops in Iraq for a considerable period.

"Assuming the conditions prevail in Iraq that allow us to continue the drawdown that the president has talked about, the idea is that we would have a much more limited role in Iraq for some protracted period of time, a stabilizing force, a force that would be a fraction of the size of what we have there now," Defense Secretary Robert Gates said on Sunday.

Gates did not estimate how large a presence would be needed.

The war in Iraq is now chiefly responsible for the ongoing federal budget deficit, which CBO says will total $158 billion for the current fiscal year. While costs would sharply decrease in the future under the Korea-like scenario, annual costs of $25 billion still would equal about two-thirds of the budget for homeland security.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Top Online Schools
Find the perfect online school and Boost your Career! Free Info Pack.
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide