Skip navigation

Dry cleaner closes after $54 million pants suit

Judge ruled in favor of D.C. owners, who were sued over lost pair of pants

Image: Jin Nam Chung, Soo Chung
Jin Nam Chung, left, and Soo Chung stand in May inside their former dry cleaning business, Custom Cleaners, which they sold, their attorney said Wednesday.
Jacquelyn Martin / AP file
Video: Life  
Tot plays hide-and-seek too well
  July 12: Two-year-old Natalie Jasmer did such a remarkable job of hiding that the family had to call police and firefighters –even the family dog – to help find her. NBC’s Jenna Wolfe is joined by Natalie, her parents Denis and Michelle, and their trusty pooch, Copper.

Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

  Photo features  
  More
Image: British forces in Afghanistan's Helmand province.
NYT via Redux
  The Week in Pictures
Vibrant fields of sunflowers, a high-rescue drama and Michael Jackson memories are among this week’s attention-grabbing images.
AP
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.
updated 8:25 p.m. ET Sept. 19, 2007

WASHINGTON - The owners of a dry cleaner who were sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants have closed and sold the shop involved in the dispute, their attorney said Wednesday.

The South Korean immigrants are citing a loss of revenue and the emotional strain of defending the lawsuit. They will focus their energy on another dry-cleaning shop they still own, said their attorney, Chris Manning.

“This is a truly tragic example of how devastating frivolous litigation can be to the American people and to small businesses,” Manning said in a statement.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Soo Chung and her husband, Jin Nam Chung, faced more than two years of litigation after a former customer at Custom Cleaners alleged they had lost a pair of his pants, then sued for $67 million under the District of Columbia’s strict consumer protection act.

Plaintiff Roy L. Pearson, a local administrative law judge, later lowered his demand to $54 million. He said the “Satisfaction Guaranteed” and “Same Day Service” signs that once hung in the shop were misleading and fraudulent.

The case went to trial in June and a D.C. Superior Court judge ruled in favor of the Chungs, awarding Pearson nothing. Pearson is pursuing an appeal.

The Chungs incurred more than $100,000 in legal expenses, which were eventually paid with help from fundraisers and donations.

Even after the trial ended favorably, Manning said, the Chungs lost customers and revenue. They have now closed two of their three businesses since the lawsuit began, he said.

Pearson did not respond to an e-mail from The Associated Press seeking comment.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide