Iraq troop reduction plan not enough, Reid says

updated 6:17 p.m. ET Sept. 12, 2007

WASHINGTON - A day before Bush was to deliver a major address on the war, Senate Democrats rejected a four-star general’s recommendation to keep some 130,000 troops in Iraq through next summer and called for legislation that would sharply limit the mission of U.S. forces.

Their proposal was not expected to set a deadline to end the war, as many Democrats want, but instead restrict troops to a narrow set of objectives: training the Iraqi military and police, protecting U.S. assets and fighting terrorists, party officials told the Associated Press.

The goal of the tempered measure is to attract enough Republican votes to break the 60-vote threshold in the Senate needed to end a filibuster — something Democrats have been unable to do since taking control of Congress eight months ago.

“I call on the Senate Republicans to not walk lockstep as they have with the president for years in this war,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., said at a Capitol Hill news conference. “It’s time to change. It’s the president’s war. At this point it also appears clear it’s also the Senate Republicans’ war.”

The developments Wednesday reflected a struggle by Democrats to regain momentum in the war debate, dominated by two days of testimony by Gen. David Petraeus, the top commander in Iraq, and Ryan Crocker, the U.S. ambassador there.

Petraeus said the 30,000 troop buildup initiated earlier this year had yielded some security gains and needed more time. He recommended slowly reversing the buildup, drawing down about 5,500 soldiers and Marines by the end of the year and returning to 130,000 troops next summer.

Plan gives 'an illusion of change'
Reid and other Democrats swiftly rejected the proposal, saying it does not go far enough.

“It creates and provides an illusion of change in an effort to take the wind out of the sails of those of us who want to truly change course in Iraq,” said Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., chairman of the Armed Services Committee.

In a bold challenge to Petraeus’ assessment of Iraq, Reid said the “situation on the ground in Iraq has not changed at all.” He later conceded some gains had been made in the western Anbar province, “but it’s like the big balloon that you push on one side and it comes out someplace else.”

Whereas Petraeus’ assessment inflamed Democrats, it assuaged many Republicans. And while it prompted tough questions from several Republican skeptics, including Sens. John Warner of Virginia and Susan Collins of Maine, most said they were still reluctant to impose a firm timetable on the war.

Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., seen as another potential swing vote on the war, said he was working with Sen. Mark Pryor, D-Ark., on legislation that would put Petraeus’ recommendations into law.

Absent a new political climate, Democrats are in a tough position: continue to insist on a hardline position and fail, letting weeks go by without passing anti-war legislation, or soften their stance.

Reid and other leading Senate Democrats huddled in Reid’s office Wednesday to discuss their next steps. At issue was how far to go in forcing a new mission for troops without losing support from either side of the political spectrum, according to congressional aides familiar with the meeting.

If the legislation is nonbinding and only urges Bush to refocus the mission, the bill could lose support from more liberal Democrats such as Sens. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., John Kerry, D-Mass., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who don’t want a watered-down debate. On the contrary, if the bill orders the mission change by a certain date, it might turn off moderates like Warner and Collins.

MORE FROM POLITICS

Politics Section Front

Chinese racist? Obama trip spurs talk   Obama hints at Pacific Rim trade pact   Obama, Medvedev to talk weapons treaty Obama: Congress should wait on Fort Hood GOP weekly address targets health strategy Palin's memoirs trigger a book boomlet Obama eyes domestic spending freeze White House says top lawyer to step down Republicans end abortion insurance for employees Napolitano says U.S. border is more secure now Politics Section Front   Add Politics headlines to your news reader: