Abizaid: U.S. isn’t fighting extremism effectively

updated 6:28 p.m. ET Sept. 11, 2007

ADELPHI, Md. - It will take three to five years before Iraq’s government is stable enough to operate on its own, according to the former commander of U.S. forces in the Middle East, who said the surge of American forces has not succeeded in solving the country’s broader problems.

In an interview with The Associated Press, retired Army Gen. John Abizaid also said that beyond attacking the global threat of terrorism with military strength, the United States has done a poor job of applying the economic, political and diplomatic means to fight Islamic extremism in Iraq and elsewhere.

“I don’t blame it on any people,” Abizaid said Tuesday. “I just blame it on a bureaucratic system that has been unresponsive thus far to the challenges of the 21st century. We need to change that as a matter of national priority.”

Abizaid retired in May after nearly four years as the top officer at U.S. Central Command, the war-fighting organization based in Tampa, Fla. that oversees military operations in a region stretching from the Central Asia to the Horn of Africa. He was in Maryland to speak at a conference on military logistics.

The United States needs to draw down forces in Iraq so the Iraqis can take control of their own affairs, Abizaid said.

“I think in terms of time, Iraq stabilizes in the next three to five years,” Abizaid said. “That means we need to adjust our presence according to the security situation.”

Abizaid opposed to 'surge'
Abizaid would not assess Army Gen. David Petraeus’ handling of the war in Iraq, saying that as a former commander he never appreciated being critiqued on the decisions he made.

“The fact the Iraqis want us to go, we want to go, is one that none of us should ever lose sight of,” he said. “We’re trying to work ourselves out of a job. But we can’t do it in a way that destabilizes the country and allows precisely the worst thing to happen, which is the country becomes an even greater safe haven for extremist groups such as al-Qaida.”

While in uniform, Abizaid had been opposed to a “surge” of U.S. forces in Iraq because he believed that simply building up military strength wouldn’t solve the more deeply embedded problems.

“It was clear that putting additional troops in would gain temporary security,” he said. “What was not clear to me was what we were going to do diplomatically, economically, politically and informationally to make sure that we moved forward in a way that just wasn’t temporary.”

“And it appears to me, that those aspects, all designed to build better governments, haven’t necessarily achieved the effect that people would have hoped for,” he added.

MORE FROM CONFLICT IN IRAQ

Conflict in Iraq Section Front

Sandstorms, drought hobble once-fertile Iraq Iraq beefs up security after attacks U.S. releases Iranian officials held in Iraq Experts: Iraq invasion harmed Babylon Conflict in Iraq Section Front   Add Conflict in Iraq headlines to your news reader: