Skip navigation

Judge OKs 10 Commandments display in Ky.

Courthouse display may remain, but lawsuit in another county will proceed

  How we worship
Christianity
Brazilians get baptized in Israel, a megachurch opens in Houston, and devotees carry a cross in the Philippines.
Islam
Whirling dervishes perform in Turkey, pilgrims gather in Mecca, and an elderly man is doused with holy water.
Judaism
Jews pray at the Mount of Olives, matzoh is baked in Brooklyn, and thousands of rabbis pose for a group photo.
Hinduism and more
Japanese ascetics hang from a cliff, Shinto believers pray in ice water and a 60-foot statue takes a colorful bath.
Video: Faith  
Synagogue performs same-sex ceremonies
June 25: A conservative rabbi at a South Florida synagogue is performing same-sex commitment ceremonies, in a state that doesn't recognize gay marriage. WTVJ's  Ari Odzer reports.

  RSS feeds on msnbc.com

Add these headlines to your news reader

updated 2:40 p.m. ET Sept. 20, 2007

PIKEVILLE, Ky. - A display of the Ten Commandments at an eastern Kentucky courthouse does not violate the Constitution, but a lawsuit challenging a similar display in another county can proceed, a federal judge has ruled.

The Ten Commandments display at the Rowan County Fiscal Court, part of an exhibit on the foundations of American law and government, “does not have the effect of endorsing religion,” U.S. District Judge Karl Forester said in a ruling released Wednesday.

Earlier this month, Forester refused to dismiss a similar suit in Garrard County, saying that “a reasonable person would conclude that the county’s display has the effect of endorsing religion.” The ruling allows that case to proceed. He said the history of the display there offered evidence suggesting “that the officially stated purpose ... is a sham” to disguise religious intent.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

The American Civil Liberties Union sued Rowan County in 2001, and its Ten Commandments display was replaced by one that also includes the Declaration of Independence, the Magna Carta, the Bill of Rights and other items on law and government.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled in 2005 that Ten Commandments displays on government property must be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Among factors making the displays constitutional, the court said, is if their main purpose was to honor the nation’s legal, rather than religious, traditions.

Click for related content

Mathew Staver, founder of Liberty Counsel, a conservative legal defense organization, called Forester’s Wednesday ruling part of a trend.

“The tide is turning against the ACLU’s war on the Ten Commandments,” Staver said in a statement.

David Friedman, general counsel for ACLU of Kentucky, said county officials’ real goal is to display the Ten Commandments, but it was difficult to prove that a religious display is “what they really care about.”

The Supreme Court’s ruling had struck down the display of the commandments in two Kentucky courthouses but upheld a granite monument near the Texas Capitol.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide