Domain name sales are red-hot-dot-com
Tech Holiday Gift Guide |
10 cool gadgets we really, really want Santa's little helpers have been busy cranking out some great stuff, from connected media players and multitouch screens to wafer-thin HDTVs and groovy netbooks. |
Tech and gadgets videos |
Police patrolling Facebook Nov. 13: The Medina, Ohio, police department is posting pictures of wanted criminals on Facebook in an effort to get the public's help in tracking them down. WKYC's Mike O'Mara reports. |
Video |
Auto Tech |
A better economy may lure buyers, but these trends could seal the deal. |
Most popular |
| |||||
How the money is made
Most of the sites are lucrative for their advertising dollars. For example, megayachts.com isn't an actual yachting site, but it contains numerous ads and links for real yacht companies, boats and cruises. The owners of the site get paid each time a viewer clicks on one of those links.
Goldberger and Fischer declined to say how much money they make from pay-per-click advertising.
Bob Parsons, CEO and founder of domain registration company GoDaddy.com, says this type of business is fairly straightforward.
"They make their money in two ways," Parsons said. "One way is through the traffic they get and the other is the appreciation of the name."
Parson didn't think there was anything wrong with the practice as long as those involved weren't using names trademarked by others.
"Domain names are becoming 21st-century real estate," Parsons said. "Just owning a domain name as an investment. I don't see a problem with that."
Anthony Malutta, a lawyer who specializes in trademark law at a San Francisco law firm, sees fewer trademark infringement cases thanks to improved laws.
"Trademark law involving domain laws is much clearer and much easier to understand," he said. "It's pretty clear that registering a domain name that corresponds to somebody's trademark is actionable. As to generics, they're just hoping to capture traffic. You're just counting on people typing in generic names instead of using a search engine like Google."
Malutta said domainers like Goldberger and Fischer are not "gaming the system," which in his opinion would mean registering domain names and then cybersquatting — deriving revenue off somebody else's trademarked name like Coca-Cola.
How to spot a winner
Over the years, Goldberger and Fischer have sharpened their formula for acquiring domain names and developing the sites using a fairly simple template, relying on research, savvy and plenty of instinct.
"You either know it or don't by hearing the name," Fischer says.
They look for names that hit the "sweet spot" — short words that describe a high-value product or services related to it. Words that allow them to own a category such as bald.com and cardiology.com, two of the domain names they bought at the auction.
To help figure out a word's potential value, they see how many hits it will produce using Google. They also troll lists of names with domain registrations set to expire, enabling them to get a jump on buying it.
They don't bother with dot-nets or the others.
"Dot-com is king," Goldberger said. "Dot-net is worthless."
But there's a big divide between thinking of a good name and getting it. There's usually a chase, with Fischer trying to persuade owners to sell the names after he locates the owners unless it's up for auction.
"He's kind of like a rhinoceros," Goldberger says about Fischer. "He chases them up a tree and waits them out. He has patience and determination. You got to be aggressive. It's a tough game now. It's like the gold rush. The first guys did really well then it became more difficult."
Boom times for the business
And expensive. Five years ago, the duo could get a good name for $10,000. Now the minimum is more like $100,000 — as the auction proved. The cheapest name they bought at the auction was blogging.com for $135,000. Other names sold for considerably less like irishwhiskey.com ($8,000) and Jewishdeli.com ($9,000).
At the moment, Fischer, Goldberger and Eli are sitting on their names. They've recently turned down million-dollar offers for stocks.com and home.com.
But as white-hot as this business has been, it might not continue to mint millionaires.
"How long will this model last?" Malutta asked. "It's definitely a temporal piece of real estate. As technology evolves, maybe direct navigation will fall off the charts, and there goes your property."
Associated Press investigative researcher Randy Herschaft in New York contributed to this report.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM TECH AND GADGETS |
| Add Tech and gadgets headlines to your news reader: |
Resource guide


