Libby, Cheney, Rove civil suit dismissed
Judge cites jurisdictional grounds, makes no comments on arguments
MSNBC video |
Judge dismisses Plame’s lawsuit July 19: Valerie Wilson’s lawsuit against Dick Cheney and other members of the Bush administration in the CIA leak case was dismissed. Her attorney Melanie Sloan and Ed Rogers, former aide to President Bush, discuss. Hardball |
NBC News video |
Wilson reacts to Libby decision July 3: Former Ambassador Joseph Wilson tells NBC News’ Lester Holt he doesn’t give a “rat’s patootie” about I. “Scooter” Libby. Today show |
NBC Video: Politics |
Push for Mideast peace Nov. 9: The Washington Post’s Chris Cillizza previews President Barack Obama’s meeting with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu at the White House Monday night. |
Slideshow |
more photos |
WASHINGTON - A federal judge dismissed former CIA operative Valerie Plame's lawsuit against members of the Bush administration Thursday, eliminating one of the last courtroom remnants of the leak scandal.
Plame, the wife of former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, had accused Vice President Dick Cheney and others of conspiring to leak her identity in 2003. Plame said that violated her privacy rights and was illegal retribution for her husband's criticism of the administration.
U.S. District Judge John D. Bates dismissed the case on jurisdictional grounds and said he would not express an opinion on the constitutional arguments. Bates dismissed the case against all defendants: Cheney, White House political adviser Karl Rove, former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.
Plame's attorneys had said the lawsuit would be an uphill battle. Public officials are normally immune from such lawsuits filed in connection with their jobs.
Wilson responded to the dismissal in a statement, saying, "This case is not just about what top government officials did to Valerie and me." He added, "We brought this suit because we strongly believe that politicizing intelligence ultimately serves only to undermine the security of our nation. Today's decision is just the first step in what we have always known would be a long legal battle and we are committed to seeing this case through."
Plame's identity was revealed in a syndicated newspaper column in 2003, shortly after Wilson began criticizing the administration's march to war in Iraq. Plame believes the leak was retribution and that it violated their constitutional rights.
Armitage and Rove were the sources for that article, which touched off a lengthy leak investigation. Nobody was charged with leaking but Libby was convicted of lying and obstruction the investigation. Bush commuted Libby's 21/2-year prison term before the former aide served any time.
|
"This just dragged on the character assassination that had gone on for years," said Alex Bourelly, one of Libby's lawyers. "To have the case dismissed is a big relief."
Plame's attorneys said they were reading the opinion and had no immediate comment.
While Bates did not address the constitutional questions, he seemed to side with administration officials who said they were acting within their job duties. Plame had argued that what they did was illegal and outside the scope of their government jobs.
"The alleged means by which defendants chose to rebut Mr. Wilson's comments and attack his credibility may have been highly unsavory, " Bates wrote. "But there can be no serious dispute that the act of rebutting public criticism, such as that levied by Mr. Wilson against the Bush administration's handling of prewar foreign intelligence, by speaking with members of the press is within the scope of defendants' duties as high-level Executive Branch officials."
NBC's Joel Seidman contributed to this report.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM POLITICS |
| Add Politics headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide






