Skip navigation

Withdraw from Iraq? Not completely

Senate Democratic leader says 'tens of thousands of troops' could remain

NBC News video
What would Iraq withdrawal look like?
July 10: NBC's Andrea Mitchell reports on what many see as inevitable -- a troop pullout in Iraq.  What would a withdrawal look like?

Today show

NBC Video: Politics
Lawyer: 9/11 defendants want to air views
  Nov. 22: According to the lawyer for one of the accused terrorists, the five men facing trial will plead not guilty so they can voice their criticisms of U.S. foreign policy. NBC’s Lester Holt reports.

Slideshow
Image: The Week in Political Cartoons
  The Week in Political Cartoons
Msnbc.com’s political cartoonists take a look back at the past week.

more photos

By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
msnbc.com
updated 9:57 a.m. ET July 10, 2007

Tom Curry
National affairs writer

E-mail
WASHINGTON - The momentum in Congress seems to be shifting in favor of withdrawal of U.S. troops from Iraq.

“The tide has turned,” said Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, Monday, as she called for the Senate to pass a measure requiring President Bush to begin a troop withdrawal.

“A growing number of Republicans... are now speaking against the failed strategy in Iraq, and that's good,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid told reporters, referring to senators such as Snowe.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Reid said these Republicans “must put their words into action by voting with us to change course and responsibly end this war.”

But, as Reid reminded reporters Monday, when he says “responsibly end this war” he does not mean “withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq.”

'Tens of thousands' could stay in Iraq
Reid noted that even the measure he co-sponsored with Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., calling on Bush to pull most troops out by next April would permit many soldiers to stay in Iraq.

“Understand even if you take (the) Feingold-Reid (proposal), Feingold-Reid called for American troops to remain in Iraq to do counterterrorism, to protect our assets in Iraq, to train the Iraqis,” Reid explained. “There's estimates that that would still leave tens of thousands of troops in Iraq.”

He also said, “No one is calling for a precipitous withdrawal in Iraq.”

But the crux of the debate in Congress and among presidential contenders is not precipitous withdrawal versus gradual withdrawal; instead it is total withdrawal versus a strategy that would leave thousands of U.S. troops there.

Assessment after tenth trip to Iraq
Just back from his tenth trip to Iraq, Sen. Jack Reed, D-R.I., stressed Monday that some U.S. troops could remain safely in bases in Kurdistan and western Iraq.

“Most of the major players (in Iraq) recognize the value of an American presence  they might disagree about size,” he said. “I think across sectarian lines, there is a feeling that the training of an appropriately professional military force is in their self-interest.”

The Rhode Island Democrat, a member of the Armed Services Committee and an Army veteran, said “I think also there is a concern that a total withdrawal of American forces very quickly would inject so much uncertainty in the situation that they’d be better off with some type of presence.”


Sponsored links

Resource guide