Skip navigation
advertisement

Two senators to watch in immigration fray


< Prev | 1 | 2
NBC Video: Politics
Small banks continue to fail
  Dec. 23: Despite President Barack Obama’s promises, the nation’s 100th small bank is set to close. A Morning Meeting panel discusses.

Slideshow
  The Week in Political Cartoons
Msnbc.com’s political cartoonists take a look back at the past week.

more photos

On the other side of the aisle, Coleman is pushing an amendment that would put limits on “sanctuary cities” that have opened their doors to illegal immigrants by declaring that police would not inquire into the immigration status of people who call for assistance or who are arrested.

“We have people here on over-extended visas. And we have cities that say ‘you can’t enforce the law.’ One of the problems we have is that people don’t think we’re serious about enforcing the law,” Coleman said.

According to the Congressional Research Service, cities from Los Angeles to Minneapolis have adopted such policies.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Rules for police inquiries
Coleman’s amendment would tell local governments they could not prohibit police officers from asking a person about his immigration status, if the officer had probable cause to think the person was not lawfully present in the United States.

“I’d still like to see a bill, but I’d like to see my amendment and Lindsey Graham has an amendment that is important. If these amendments don’t get passed, then I’m going to have to decide what I’m going to do,” the Minnesota Republican said.

U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzales survives attempt at no-confidence vote
Stefan Zaklin / EPA file
Sen. Norm Coleman, R- Minn., said local police should be able to ask about the immigration status of those with whom they come into contact.

Graham's amendment would require illegal immigrants who intend to apply for legal status to leave the United States within three years and return to their home country before applying. It would also crack down on foreign visitors who overstay their visas.

Coleman said, “If we improve the bill, then I could vote for it. If it is not improved, then I will vote against it.”

Asked whether his own amendment must be part of the bill in order for him to vote for it, Coleman said, “I’d be hard pressed to support this bill” if it isn’t.

“If my piece doesn’t pass, you’re literally saying ‘the law needs to be enforced, we need to deal with this issue, but we’re going to gag police officers.’ That’s the wrong signal to send.”

So will the immigration bill live or die?

In a tale that’s had a dozen twists and turns so far, these two senators used to dramatic outcomes may determine the bill’s fate — and make more drama before the Senate immigration battle is over.

© 2009 msnbc.com Reprints


< Prev | 1 | 2

Sponsored links

Resource guide