Skip navigation
advertisement

Dry cleaner wins in $54 million suit for pants

Judge rules plaintiff must pay court costs

MSNBC video
Dry cleaner owners: 'Very, very pleased'
June 25: The owners of a dry cleaners that was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants talk to reporters after a judge ruled in their favor.

MSNBC

MSNBC video
Dry cleaner wins
June 25: A judge rules in favor of a pair of dry cleaners who were sued for $54 million after being accused of losing a pair of pants.

NBC News

Video: Life  
When the Saints go marching in
  In the middle of Mardi Gras revelry, the Saints Super Bowl parade on Tuesday took center stage. NBC's Janet Shamlian reports.

  Photo features  
  More
Image: The Week in Pictures
Reuters
  The Week in Pictures
Snow and ice abound, Haiti goes on, State of the Union view, Machu Picchu flooding, a firefighter’s reprieve in Nigeria and more news and feature images from around the world.
Image: Amphibious Bus Is Taken For Its Second Test Drive In River Clyde
Getty Images
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.
updated 2:35 p.m. ET June 25, 2007

WASHINGTON - A judge ruled Monday in favor of a dry cleaner that was sued for $54 million over a missing pair of pants.

The owners of Custom Cleaners did not violate the city's Consumer Protection Act by failing to live up to Roy L. Pearson's expectations of the "Satisfaction Guaranteed" sign once displayed in the store window, District of Columbia Superior Court Judge Judith Bartnoff ruled.

Bartnoff ordered Pearson to pay the court costs of defendants Soo Chung, Jin Nam Chung and Ki Y. Chung.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

Pearson, an administrative law judge, originally sought $67 million from the Chungs, claiming they lost a pair of suit trousers and later tried to give him a pair that he said was not his. He arrived at the amount by adding up years of alleged law violations and almost $2 million in common law claims.

Pearson later dropped demands for damages related to the pants and focused his claims on signs in the shop, which have since been removed.

Chris Manning, the Chungs' attorney, argued that no reasonable person would interpret the signs to mean an unconditional promise of satisfaction.

The Chungs said the trial had taken an enormous financial and emotional toll on them and exposed them to widespread ridicule.

The two-day trial earlier this month drew a standing-room-only crowd and overshadowed the drunken driving trial of former Mayor Marion Barry.

© 2010 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide