Skip navigation

NBC tests prompt investigation into U.S. armor

Lawmakers request comparison of standard-issue, alternative product

The Dragon Skin debate
Fathers outraged by military body armor
May 17: NBC's Lisa Myers talks with Moe Rimes, Warren Sprinkle and John Grant, fathers of sons serving overseas who feel the Army has not made it possible for their sons to wear the best possible body armor.
Army defends its body armor
May 17: Brig. Gen. Mark Brown explains to NBC's Lisa Myers why the Army says America's fighting men and women are wearing the best possible body armor.
Video: Military news
Obama's plan to ‘finish the job’ in Afghanistan
Nov. 24: Msnbc political analyst Richard Wolffe talks about the differences in war strategy between President Barack Obama and former President George Bush.

Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 6:25 p.m. ET June 6, 2007

WASHINGTON - Federal lawmakers on Wednesday requested independent third-party testing of whether standard-issue body armor for U.S. soldiers is more effective than an alternative.

At issue are conflicts between year-old test results released by the Army last month and testing conducted by NBC News and broadcast in May.

“Let’s get right down to the nuts and bolts here and see which one of these tests are right,” Rep. Duncan Hunter, R-Calif., ranking member of the House Armed Services committee, said at a hearing on the issue.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

On May 3 at a ballistics laboratory in Germany, NBC News testing showed that Dragon Skin, made by privately held Pinnacle Armor Inc., outperformed Interceptor, the Army’s standard-issue armor. Before the results were aired, a retired U.S. general reviewed the testing conducted in simulated combat conditions.

Army disputes NBC report
The Army disputes the results and released a report contradicting NBC’s claims after the network’s report aired.

Murray Neal, Pinnacle’s chief executive, testified Wednesday that the Army misrepresented and distorted its test results.

“I’m asking for an independent test because the information coming out of the Army is fraught full of inaccuracies,” Neal said.

Senior Army officials testified that they were confident in what they said are “unbiased” test results.

Dragon Skin is provided to some special services soldiers and others can buy it with their own money if they don’t like the heavier-weight Interceptor armor.

Pinnacle has competed for Army contracts on body armor but lost out five times because its product did not meet specifications.

Costa Mesa, Calif.-based Ceradyne Inc. and Chandler, Ariz.-based Armor Works LLC are two companies that manufacture Interceptor. Falls Church, Va.-based General Dynamics Corp., identified in an earlier story as a body armor manufacturer, makes armor for vehicles, not personnel.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide