‘Shrek’ loses steam in ‘Third’ film
Running low on jokes, filmmakers desperately turn to the Camelot legend
![]() Dreamworks Animation Shrek (Mike Myers) must convince Artie (Justin Timberlake) to take the throne with a little help from Donkey (Eddie Murphy) in "Shrek the Third." |
Shrek, a sweet-natured ogre whose rancid greenish color suggests a poorly adjusted color television set, has become the hero of the most successful fractured fairy tale in film history.
The original “Shrek,” which won the first Academy Award for best animated feature, set several box-office records in 2001. The 2004 sequel drew much larger audiences, eventually landing in the No. 3 spot on the all-time top-10 list of moneymakers, right behind “Titanic” and “Star Wars.” Too bad it lacked the freshness of the original.
“Shrek the Third,” which is competing at the box office this month with third installments of “Spider-Man” and “Pirates of the Caribbean,” may have trouble maintaining that popularity. The slide in quality this time is steep. The franchise, which desperately turns to the Camelot legend for inspiration, is clearly facing an identity crisis. Even the opening, in which the DreamWorks logo is followed by storm clouds, seems ominous.
Shrek (Mike Myers) doesn’t want to be Shrek, at least not King Shrek, now that his froggy father-in-law (John Cleese) has croaked and left him ruling the land of Far Far Away. Shrek would rather be his slobbery self and hand over his kingly duties to Fiona’s wimpish relative, Arthur/Artie (Justin Timberlake). Merlin (Eric Idle) makes an appearance and there are even cameo roles for Guinevere and Lancelot.
But the kingdom will not easily go to Arthur, who is required to fight for the crown with wicked Prince Charming (Rupert Everett), who has radicalized the peasants, the witch from “Snow White” and several other monsters. Seldom has the potential for a coup d’etat seemed less urgent.
|
The most noticeable missing element in “Shrek 2” was the visual wit of the original. The characters seemed blander, less outrageous, less three-dimensional. And no villain could replace the first film’s wonderfully ridiculous Lord Farquaad (voice by John Lithgow), who looked like a trash-compacted Shakespeare with a 5 o’clock shadow.
The plot of “2” also lacked the simplicity and perverse purpose of “Shrek,” which turned everything upside down by transforming an ogre into a hero and a princess into a dumpling. “Shrek 2,” which played with the drawbacks of “happily ever after,” had a different, less immediately compelling agenda.
|
And whereas the first “Shrek” made surprisingly adroit use of Leonard Cohen’s “Hallelujah” and Neil Diamond’s “I’m a Believer,” the second one tried too hard with David Bowie’s “Changes” and other obvious or less-than-inspired choices.
“Shrek the Third,” co-directed by Chris Miller and Raman Hui (replacing the original directors, Andrew Adamson and Vicky Jenson), is a cluttered, uneasy mixture of “1” and “2.” While it revives Sleeping Beauty (Cheri Oteri) and others as accomplices to the heroine, Princess Fiona (Cameron Diaz), the screenplay (by Miller and several others) fails to provide them with much definition. Ian McShane appears as Capt. Hook, Cody Cameron is Pinocchio, but they’re throwaway parts.
And the song list is hopeless. The king’s funeral is tastelessly attached to Wings’ James Bond anthem, “Live and Let Die,” a dance is half-heartedly staged to a song from “A Chorus Line,” and there’s even a spot singled out for the terribly dated “I’ve Never Been to Me.”
Julie Andrews, wasted as the voice of the queen, is heard wistfully humming a few notes from “Mary Poppins.” Perhaps she’s remembering when she used to be offered roles worthy of her talents. Much easier to take are the classical excerpts from Saint-Saens, Mendelssohn and Elgar — all of which work rather well in the context of the new film.
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM AT THE MOVIES |
| Add At the movies headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide


