Is weight loss about money, power and trends?
In 'Rethinking Thin,' Gina Kolata examines society’s obsession with dieting
NBC News video |
The body has a mind of its own April 30: TODAY host Meredith Vieira talks to Dr. Nancy Snyderman about a new book that explores the myth and realities of dieting. Today Show Health |

Big changes in store for Oprah? Nov. 8: Is the queen of daytime television preparing to give up her popular talk show to focus on her own cable network? NBC’s Kevin Tibbles reports, then Rolling Stone contributor Toure and CNBC’s Carmen Wong Ulrich join Jenna Wolfe to discuss the financial and cultural impact of a potential move. |
Is dieting and weight loss about staying healthy and keeping in shape or more about money, power, and trends? In the new book “Rethinking Thin: The New Science of Weight Loss—and the Myths and Realities of Dieting,” author Gina Kolata examines society’s obsession with dieting and fitness and makes a strong critique of the weight-loss industry. By tracking different dieters and fads, Kolata helps tackle such issues as why people remain overweight when there is so much social pressure to be thin, the importance of genes in determining weight and how psychological factors, like stress, can affect you. Here is an excerpt:
Prologue
Three obesity researchers were having breakfast at a medical meeting in Charleston, South Carolina, a few years ago when their talk inevitably turned to the Atkins diet. It had reached a new peak of popularity, and they were simply annoyed with the diet and the whole low-carb movement. It just irked them that this seemingly irrational way to lose weight, this seemingly unhealthy, if not dangerous, diet scheme, was being hailed as the secret to effortless and permanent weight loss. The whole Atkins movement was built on testimonials, they groused.
“We kept saying, ‘Nobody has any data,’” said Gary D. Foster, who was the clinical director of the weight loss center at the University of Pennsylvania. Finally, the three decided, Why not do a study? They had not applied for funds, but they were curious enough to do some research anyway. “It would be quick and dirty,” Foster remarked, just a brief look at whether the Atkins diet had any value. The three fully expected to discredit it, showing it was no better, maybe even worse, than traditional diets for weight loss, and dangerous to boot. They just knew that the diet was going to do something awful to cholesterol levels and that people who followed it were going to be risking a heart attack.
![]() |
And, they slowly realized, they also would be asking a question that, amazingly enough, had never been asked in a rigorous way: Is one diet any better than another? You might think that with all the years, all the decades, of obesity research, the answer would be obvious. It’s a question that, of course, would have been well studied. But you would be wrong. That question, that fundamental question, had just been left dangling.
And so it began, the first attempt to compare the Atkins diet with something more traditional, the standard low-calorie, low-fat diet beloved of academic weight loss clinics.
The study took place at three medical centers—the University of Pennsylvania, the University of Colorado, and Washington University in St. Louis—and was directed by the three doctors who conceived it. It was small, involving just sixty-three obese men and women, people whose average weight was 216 pounds. And it lasted for one year. The subjects were randomly assigned to follow the Atkins diet—the researchers handed them the book Dr. Atkins’ New Diet Revolution—or to follow a diet and behavior modification plan written by Kelly Brownell, a Yale psychologist who publishes an earnest textbook-like manual called The LEARN Program for Weight Management. “We picked LEARN because it is the most frequently used manual [at weight loss centers],” Foster explained. “It is the gold standard for weight loss and behavioral weight control.”
No one could have been more surprised than these researchers when they saw the results.
The Atkins diet, they discovered, seemed better than the usual diet program, at least for the first six months; the subjects’ weight loss, an average of 7 percent of their body weight, was twice as good as with the low-calorie diet. Granted, no one lost much weight, and granted, 40 percent of each group dropped out, and granted, by the time a year was up, the two groups were about equal in their total weight loss and almost everyone in either group who lost weight had regained most of it. The Atkins dieters ended up, on average, losing 4.4 percent of their body weight, or about 91/2 pounds, and the low-calorie dieters lost about 2.5 percent, or about 51/2 pounds, but the difference between the groups was not statistically different. Still, the Atkins diet, to the investigators’ astonishment, led to higher levels of HDL cholesterol, which is linked to protection against heart disease, and lower levels of triglycerides in the blood, which also indicate a reduced heart disease risk. The conventional diet did just the opposite.
“That’s not what we expected,” Foster said. “How did it happen? Was it good? Was it bad? Was it indifferent?” And, most important, “What is the best way to lose weight?”
This last one is a fraught question, of course. To someone like Gary Foster, tall with a long, gangly body and barely a hint of a paunch, a man who does not worry about his weight, the question is of academic interest. It is a research puzzle, a query that could lead to more grants for his university’s weight loss center, which paid his salary, and that could lead to publications in leading medical journals, bolstering his professional reputation. But for the millions of overweight people who have spent their lives obsessing about food, veering from one diet, one weight loss plan, to another, thinking about food and their weight every day of their lives, the question is all too immediate.
The three researchers published their results in the May 22, 2003, issue of the New England Journal of Medicine, one of the most prestigious medical journals. Their paper was accompanied by an editorial that ended with the usual platitudes. “The recipe for effective weight loss is a combination of motivation, physical activity, and caloric restriction,” it said. “Until further evidence is available regarding the long-term benefits of a low-carbohydrate approach, physicians should continue to recommend a healthy lifestyle that includes regular physical activity and a balanced diet.”
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM |
| Add headlines to your news reader: |
Sponsored links
Resource guide


