Bush challenges Congress on Iraq war bill

WASHINGTON - President Bush expressed frustration on Tuesday with the congressional debate on Iraq war spending and accused majority-party Democrats of being “more interested in fighting political battles in Washington than providing our troops what they need.”

He also chided the Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi for visiting Syria, saying it sent mixed signals to the government of President Bashar Assad.

Bush, speaking with reporters in the Rose Garden of the White House, renewed his veto threats on both House and Senate spending bills.

The president, condemning the “political dance” of protracted funding debate, threw down the gauntlet to a recalcitrant Democratic Congress, challenging the body to send him an Iraq spending bill he could sign by mid-May “without strings and without delay.”

“If Congress does not act, the Army may have to delay formation of new combat teams,” he said. The president called it "irresponsible for the Democratic leadership" to continue delaying the funding for the war.

“That is unacceptable to me, and I believe it's unacceptable to the American people,” he said.

“Debating these differences should not come at the expense of our troops,” Bush said. “Congress shouldn’t tell generals how to run the war.”

“Delays beyond April and into May will affect the readiness of the American military. Enough politics,” he said.

He noted that it had been 57 days since he requested more than $100 billion for Iraq and Afghanistan.

“They left for spring break without finishing their work,” Bush said, referring to Congress.

‘The will of the American people’
Meanwhile, Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., criticized Bush for his plan to veto the measure.

“This is vetoing the will of the American people,” she said. “It is time for us to get them out of the middle of this sectarian civil war.”

Clinton began her day by joining former Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack and his wife, Christie, for breakfast at their Mount Pleasant home. Clinton hopes to build support for her presidential campaign by joining the Vilsacks, who endorsed her last week.

Battle on the Hill
Bush and Congress have been wrestling for the upper hand in the Iraq war debate, with neither side willing to back down and a top Democrat saying for the first time he wants to withdraw money for combat.

FREE VIDEO Can Dems end the war? April 3:  Do the Democrats have the power to end this war?  Hardball host Chris Matthews asks Rep. Charlie Rangel, D-N.Y. Hardball

The president's remarks came one day after Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, who previously has stopped short of saying he would support measures to cut off funds, announced he would try to eliminate money for the war if Bush rejects Congress' proposal to set a deadline to end combat.

The House and Senate are preparing to send Bush a bill by the end of the month that would approve some $96 billion in new money for the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, but also set an end date to combat in Iraq. The House wants to order troops out by September 2008, whereas the Senate wants troops to begin leaving right away and set a nonbinding goal of ending combat operations on March 31, 2008; Bush has promised to veto the legislation.

"If the president vetoes the supplemental appropriations bill and continues to resist changing course in Iraq, I will work to ensure this legislation receives a vote in the Senate in the next work period," Reid said in a statement.

MORE FROM POLITICS

Politics Section Front

Palin to resign as Alaska governor Analysis: Palin prepping for 2012 run? Palin's e-mails still elusive Obama talks Russia, Sotomayor, jobs, Jackson   ‘Mississippi Burning’ town gets black mayor Cheney discussed inquiries into CIA leak Newsweek: First lady reaches out to D.C.’s poor Documents reveal chaos of Gitmo’s early days Sitting duck? Palin wins dubious honor Obama delays release of CIA report Politics Section Front   Add Politics headlines to your news reader: