White House crises show new accountability

ANALYSIS

By Peter Baker and Michael Abramowitz

updated 8:50 a.m. ET March 14, 2007

MERIDA, Mexico, March 13 - As President Bush toured ancient Mayan ruins and exchanged toasts with the new Mexican president Tuesday, his aides furiously worked the telephones back to Washington. Another administration official was out, and the attorney general was deflecting calls for his own ouster as well.

The cascade of controversies that followed Bush to Latin America has left a president familiar with weathering crises in uncharted territory. For the first time since taking office, Bush confronts political furors on multiple fronts and an opposition Congress armed with the subpoena power to investigate them.

More politics news

The response to the dispute over dismissed federal prosecutors underscores the inexperience of a White House accustomed to having its own party in control on Capitol Hill. After first brushing aside suggestions from a Congress that had been reluctant to exercise oversight for the last six years that the firings may have been improper, officials then sought to minimize White House involvement in the mass ouster. Tuesday's release of e-mails documenting the role of key administration figures in the decision to dismiss the prosecutors provoked outrage on both sides of the aisle.

In the past, questions about its actions might have died down without the internal administration e-mails being made public. Now the White House is in the position of explaining why it has repeatedly changed its story.

Rep. Thomas M. Davis III (Va.), the ranking Republican on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said Democrats will not let Bush brush aside controversies. "This is going to be a rockier year for the White House because every time there is a perceived mistake, they can fire up an investigation," he said. "It puts the White House on the defensive."

‘Checks and balances’
"What you have got is a White House that has become an accountability-free zone that is now facing the reality of checks and balances from Congress," said Rep. Chris Van Hollen (Md.), a member of the House Democratic leadership. "You had a White House that was used to a rubber-stamp Congress for so long that they could get away with anything. This is the kind of stuff that in the past Congress would have put their head in the sand about."

The matter over the U.S. attorneys comes to a head amid a two-week period of repeated blows to the administration. The uproar over conditions at Walter Reed Army Medical Center triggered multiple investigations and resignations. The perjury trial of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, Vice President Cheney's former top aide, ended in the conviction of the highest-ranking White House official in two decades. And an internal investigation uncovered an array of FBI abuses of intelligence-gathering powers.

Bush has been confronted with questions about some of these matters as he made his way across Latin America, and dispatched one of his closest aides, counselor Dan Bartlett, to go before cameras to defend the White House on the prosecutor dismissals. Bartlett dismissed any broader interpretation of the spate of investigations. "You're trying to connect a lot of dots that are not connectible," he said. "These are tough, tense times. But that doesn't negate the fact that the people who serve the administration or the country have to live up to the highest standards and we'll accept nothing less."

Shifting version of events
At the same time, he acknowledged, the U.S. attorney issue was mishandled, noting that Justice Department officials initially offered a misleading explanation. "They didn't want to make this a big public embarrassment about the managerial decisions internally being made in the Department of Justice, which, unfortunately left a different impression as to why" the prosecutors were fired, Bartlett said.

He made no mention, however, of the shifting White House version of events. A week ago, the White House said it knew of no involvement of Deputy Chief of Staff Karl Rove. But this week it disclosed that Rove was consulted two years ago on a suggestion to fire all 93 U.S. attorneys and that he warned against it. On Tuesday, Bartlett said that "it wouldn't be surprising that Karl or other people were receiving these complaints" about prosecutors and passing them on.

MORE FROM POLITICS

Politics Section Front

Senate set for health care debate Levin: Afghan forces key to success Newsweek: Why Cheney should run in 2012 NYT: White House intruders want to sell tale NYT: S.C. rift highlights debate in GOP Life isn’t all glamor for Obama crashers Marines to renew focus on Taliban haven Can Obama retain Hispanic support? Senate report: Bin Laden was 'within grasp' Dinner crashers met Obama, White House says Politics Section Front   Add Politics headlines to your news reader: