Skip navigation

This just in: Hilton a hard habit to break

AP's tongue-in-cheek Paris ban proves news is in the eye of the beholder

Image: Paris Hilton
Kerstin Joensson / AP
The Associated Press' ban on Paris Hilton stories proved to be short-lived.
Slideshow
Paris Hilton
  Ooo la la! It’s Paris!
The highs and lows of trés jolie media darling Paris Hilton’s life.

more photos

  Celebrity video
Glenn Close: My sister is 'my hero'
  Nov. 11: Making a Difference: The award-winning actress Glenn Close has played dozens of powerful, memorable parts, but off-screen she's taken on a supporting role at a recovery center for people with mental illness. NBC's Anne Thompson reports.

Slideshow
Image: Elizabeth Hurley
  Best and worst celebrity fashions of 2009
From glamorous gowns to stylish suits to complete fashion failures, a look at the year so far.

more photos

By Michael Ventre
msnbc.com contributor
updated 3:31 p.m. ET March 2, 2007

In journalism school, there are some lessons that are easily absorbed, and others that require a period of time to marinate. Among the ones I grasped almost immediately included bringing a notebook with me on interviews instead of scribbling on a cocktail napkin or a menu, using the word “alleged” to describe a suspect until the guilty-as-sin lowlife was convicted, and ending all stories with the now-archaic “30” as opposed to affixing the more conventional “The End” so confused readers will know it’s journalism and not a fairy tale.

But when it came to news judgment, I quickly realized that I was on my own, as evidenced by the way my journalism professors would shrug whenever I posed an example. I recall being perturbed, unsure if my instructors were being coy or clueless. Here I was spending thousands on a college education and I couldn’t get a straight answer when it came to what was news and what wasn’t. All I received were blank stares and mutterings of “What do you think?” to which I would reply with an under-my-breath “If I knew, why the &%$!! would I ask you?”

This age-old dilemma arose anew this week when the Associated Press announced that it was issuing a ban on all stories about Paris Hilton. To use a sports analogy, AP people are the offensive linemen of journalism. They toil in relative obscurity, yet their work is essential. They get almost no credit, and yet so many others are dependent upon their efforts. They also often spend time in a semi-crouch position with one hand on the ground, but whereas linemen do so by design, AP reporters and editors end up that way as the result of too many Paris Hilton stories.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

As it turns out, the AP ban lasted only a week or so. It was more of an experiment than an etched-in-stone policy. The AP wanted to see if it could exist without the ubiquitous no-talent birdbrain gracing its wire copy. And this prohibition was done with a sense of humor, although when I think of the AP editors I’ve known over the years I’m assuming the news service had to contract out to find somebody who had one.

But just like the Petri dishes that were my journalism classes, this presents a larger issue: What is news?

Here we go again.

For the purposes of this discussion, I would like to think of the Associated Press as a person. Specifically, the AP is a somewhat tall, overweight, middle-aged man with glasses and an ill-fitting suit that he bought off the rack. He likes to go around to the corner bar at lunchtime for a couple of martinis, which he expenses. He’s got a photo on his desk of a wife and two kids, even if they aren’t his. And he loves journalism with all his heart, even though he hasn’t written a story since his sophomore year.

Frankly, I prefer that AP be a rich, attractive, uninhibited young woman, but I was afraid that might color my judgment on this topic.


Sponsored links

Resource guide