Atheist group challenges Bush faith initiative

updated 8:33 a.m. ET Feb. 23, 2007

MADISON, Wis. - Annie Laurie Gaylor speaks with a soft voice, but her message catches attention: Keep God out of government.

Gaylor has helped transform the Freedom From Religion Foundation from obscurity into the nation’s largest group of atheists and agnostics, with a fast-rising membership and increasing legal clout.

Next week, the group started by Gaylor and her mother in the 1970s to take on the religious right will fight its most high-profile battle when the U.S. Supreme Court hears arguments on its lawsuit against President Bush’s faith-based initiative.

The court will decide whether taxpayers can sue over federal funding that the foundation believes promotes religion. It could be a major ruling for groups that fight to keep church and state separate.

“What’s at stake is the right to challenge the establishment of religion by the government,” Gaylor said.

The 51-year-old once donned a nun’s habit as a college student in 1977 to protest a judge who blamed rape on women who wear provocative clothing.

She uses different tactics these days, though her activism remains strong.

Among its victories, the group has stopped funding for a Milwaukee charity that Bush visited during the 2000 campaign and an Arizona group that preached to children of prisoners.

The case in front of the high court claims White House conferences to promote the faith-based initiative turn into unconstitutional pep rallies for religion.

The initiative helps religious organizations get government funding to provide social services.

George Washington University law professor Ira Lupu called the Madison-based foundation “by far the most aggressive litigating entity against the faith-based initiative.”

“When they can prove there’s religious content in those programs, they’ve been quite successful and they’ve won a few cases,” Lupu said. “When they’ve tried to go after the initiative as a whole, they’ve been less successful.”

‘They have disrupted government funding’
Critics say the group imposes such an extreme view of the First Amendment that religious groups can’t receive tax dollars for even laudable purposes.

“They are successful in the sense that they have disrupted government funding for faith-based initiatives,” said Jordan Lorence of the Alliance Defense Fund, which defends religion in the public arena. “But real people with real problems are no longer getting help because of some of their lawsuits.”

MORE FROM POLITICS

Politics Section Front

Obama hints at Pacific Rim trade pact Obama, Medvedev to talk weapons treaty Obama: Congress should wait on Fort Hood GOP weekly address targets health strategy   Palin's memoirs trigger a book boomlet Obama eyes domestic spending freeze White House says top lawyer to step down Republicans end abortion insurance for employees Napolitano says U.S. border is more secure now Lawmakers differ on Gitmo trial decision Politics Section Front   Add Politics headlines to your news reader: