Former NASA doctor says agency must do more

James Oberg NBC News space analyst

A NASA astronaut flying a T-38 jet in May of 1989 came within a hundred feet of hitting a Pan American passenger jet, barely avoiding a colossal tragedy.

The astronaut, David Walker, had just returned from commanding his first space shuttle mission — and was reportedly involved in a bitter divorce.

Although NASA never made any official mention of his stressful family situation, it clearly considered him at fault. He was grounded and removed from command of a later scheduled shuttle flight. The flying ban was eventually rescinded and Walker went on to command two more missions safely before retiring in 1996. He died in 2001.

Serious questions are being raised this week about how closely NASA monitors the mental health of its astronauts, particularly regarding personal situations that could detract from their ability to handle their stressful jobs. NASA Administrator Mike Griffin has ordered a full review of current procedures and an assessment of potential improvements to them.

Veteran NASA flight surgeon and professional psychiatrist Patricia Santy worked at NASA's Johnson Space Center in Houston from 1984 to 1991, eventually becoming flight surgeon, or flight doctor, at Mission Control Center. She also is a board-certified psychiatrist, and helped develop psychiatric standards used to assess astronaut applicants in that period. She literally wrote the book on the physiological analysis involved in choosing space flyers titled "Choosing the Right Stuff: The Psychological Selection of Astronauts and Cosmonauts." She is widely regarded as a leading authority on the psychology of human spaceflight.

Santy talked to MSNBC.com about NASA practices and her thoughts about potential improvements to the screening process.

Santy says she considers crew mental health to be just as important an aspect of flight safety as physical health and hardware function — and deserving of just as serious consideration. Although, she says, that's hardly the case.

“NASA won't even launch the shuttle if a screw is out of place in its hardware,” she said, “but they don't think that this kind of interpersonal stress can result in catastrophic failure in the human element of their space system.”

Santy said there has been progress, but that there’s a long way to go.

“It is better than it was in the past, but as an institution, NASA tends to deny behavioral issues are a big problem for astronauts,” she said.

NASA needs to go further
Santy believes that the selection procedures, which screen for psychiatric disorders, are sufficient. But they should go further.

“No selection procedure — no matter how good — can serve to identify future problems,” she said. “The problem for NASA is that there is no routine follow-up of the psychiatric or psychological evaluation after selection.” The space agency, she believes, “has always had a lot of hubris in this area.”

“People who make good astronauts are not particularly insightful individuals in general,” she said. “They have what can be called an ‘anti-psychological’ attitude and believe that they can cope with anything on their own.”

This can become a problem because “while astronauts are in general very stress tolerant, they are hardly immune from developing problems in their lives that can affect their performance both in their ground-based roles and their space roles.”

She said that has led to bad policies on astronaut mental health.

“NASA's failure in this area has always been an overreliance on astronaut's own assessment of their mental health and their inability to recognize that interpersonal issues, stress and psychological factors can have a profound impact on performance.”

This reticence to submit to formal psychological support programs can lead, Santy argues, to a worrisome practice — secret, private counseling shielded from NASA.

“When either medical or psychiatric issues arise, astronauts will surreptitiously go outside the system because they know it will cause them to get grounded. When that is discovered — and it usually is — there have never been any serious consequences.” This practice has reportedly gone back decades, to the very beginning of the astronaut program.

Santy said NASA needs to take control over backdoor counseling and employ a defensive screening program of its own.

“NASA needs to be able to identify such problems early and intervene both for the sake of the individual and for the sake of the program,” she said. “The psychological evaluation should be a standard part of all the annual medical evaluations and not just at selection.

"Astronaut managers and flight surgeons should make sure that psychosocial events have not occurred in the astronaut's life that could have an impact on his or her performance as an astronaut — and they should not just take the astronaut's word that they haven't.”

MORE FROM SCIENCE

Science Section Front

Vanished Persian army said found in desert What your Facebook photo says about you Expert: Separate pandas to rekindle affection Cosmic Log: DNA barcodes make their mark Did Neanderthals have sex with modern man? British scientists challenge government Antarctic lakes loaded with mysterious viruses Military drones enlisted as climate scouts Before flowers, odd bugs pollinated plants Study: Nanoparticles can damage DNA Science Section Front   Add Science headlines to your news reader: