America’s best and worst housing markets

By Matt Woolsey

updated 5:14 p.m. ET Feb. 1, 2007

Talk about being in the right place at the right time.

While speculators and flippers in places such as Boston and San Diego are running for cover, in other parts of the country they are basking in robust residential sales. Third-quarter median home prices last year climbed 14.6 percent in Seattle, Wash.; 14.3 percent in El Paso, Texas; and 12.3 percent in Portland, Ore.

They also increased by roughly 5 percent in Houston, Texas; Los Angeles, Calif.; Austin, Texas; Jacksonville, Fla.; and Charlotte, N.C., over the year before, according to the National Association of Realtors.

Prices also jumped along the Gulf Coast, a good sign for Post-Katrina economic recovery efforts. Median home prices increased by 15.5 percent in Gulfport-Biloxi, Miss.; 14.1 percent in Baton Rouge, La.; and 7.6 percent in New Orleans, La.

WINNERS, LOSERS Best-performing 1. Seattle, Wash. 2. El Paso, Texas 3. Houston, Texas Full list Worst-performing 1. Detroit, Mich. 2. Miami, Fla. 3. Indianapolis, Ind. Full list

Price figures are based on total metropolitan areas as defined by the United States Office of Management and Budget. So, while the New York City metro area grew at a solid, but not blockbuster, rate of 3.6 percent, officials from New York’s Finance Department say the five boroughs grew at 19 percent in 2006 — twice the 2005 figure — with prices in Brooklyn and the Bronx swelling 27.6 percent from the previous year.

In the rest of the country, median home prices on average dropped 1.2 percent. The most affected area was the Northeast, where median home prices plunged 4.8 percent over the last year.

Those homeowners would be better off heading west where realtors expect prices to continue to rise.

MORE FROM FORBES Priciest gated communities Running a mega-mansion Homes of the billionaires Most expensive homes in the world Most expensive homes in the U.S.

“There are still plenty of people out there looking to buy homes, our local economy is holding strong and there are a lot of people moving into the city,” says Kristine Losh, a broker with Ewing & Clark. “Geographically, Seattle is long and thin and surrounded by water. There’s not much room, so you’ve got a lot of people trying to get the same small amount of land.”

Cities showing gains exhibited high job growth and positive net migration figures. They were also areas in which home affordability remained close to national averages through the boom, making them less prone to the corrections and adjustments seen in overheated markets.

Cities most affected by the downturn were old-line industrial markets such as Detroit or Lansing, where local economies are suffering the effects of mass layoffs in the auto industry.

In the Northeast, the number of jobs created last year grew only 0.8 percent, according to the New England Economic Partnership (NEEP), versus the 1.3 percent national growth rate. If that's not bad enough, NEEP’s projections for increases in gross regional product and per capita income also lag significantly behind national averages.

As a result, people are leaving the area. The latest United States Census net migration figures indicate that 4.6 percent more people left the region than entered it last year. The regional real estate market also experienced a 4.8 percent drop in median prices. On the flipside, the South’s economic conditions lead to the nation’s best migration rate (3.4  percent) and subsequently, at -.1 percent, the nation’s best median home price growth figures.

From 2004 to 2005, median homes prices in most of the cities that are now resisting downturn, such as Austin and Charlotte, grew at slower rates than the national average.

This made them less susceptible to the sudden swings of a high-flying, highly speculative market such as Miami. In this area, median home price exploded from $232,000 in 2003, to $391,000 at the end of 2005, driven by a market in which builders couldn’t keep pace with demand. Miami’s real estate market has since corrected, moving down 5.6 percent from its peak.

MORE FROM FORBES

Forbes Section Front

The key to dealing with lousy boss: negotiation IRS rules for medical deductions are sickening Tailgate much? These are the rides you need What automakers have in store for 2010 Top-earning dead celebrity? Not Jackson Need to fire someone? Here’s what to do America’s highest-paid female CEOS Cars with the worst fuel economy Economy is spooking Halloween shoppers The most expensive cities in America Forbes Section Front