Skip navigation

Army chief says Bush ordered too many GIs

President is sending thousands too many, according to outgoing top general

IMAGE: Carl Levin, John McCain, John Warner
Susan Walsh / AP
Senate Armed Services Committee Chairman Carl Levin, left, talks with Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., center, and John Warner, R-Va., on Thursday prior to the committee's hearing on the nomination of Gen. George Casey to become Army chief of staff.
NBC VIDEO
McCain rips Casey
Feb. 1: Sen. John McCain confronted Gen. George Casey with a devastating assessment. NBC's Jim Miklaszewski reports.

Nightly News

Conflict in Iraq video  
Money talks for Blackwater in Iraq
Nov. 10: The New York Times reports that the Blackwater security company authorized secret payments to Iraqi officials to silence criticism. Rachel Maddow talks about these new revelations with Jeremy Scahill, reporter for The Nation.

  Timeline  
  
Image: Ayatollah Khomeini
AP file

The relationship is at center of world affairs and America's global interests

Interactive
Fight for Iraq
Learn more about the ethnic, religious and political powerplays in this virtual tour led by NBC’s Richard Engel.
Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 9:12 p.m. ET Feb. 1, 2007

WASHINGTON - The outgoing top U.S. general in Iraq diplomatically aired his differences with the commander in chief on Thursday, telling lawmakers that President Bush has ordered thousands more troops into Iraq than needed to tame down violence in Baghdad.

Gen. George Casey quickly added he understood how his recently confirmed successor, Lt. Gen. David Petraeus, could want the full complement of 21,500 additional troops that Bush has ordered to Iraq. Casey said they could “either reinforce success, maintain momentum or put more forces in a place where the plans are not working.”

As the general spoke at a confirmation hearing into his nomination to become Army chief of staff, the full Senate lurched toward a widely anticipated debate on the administration’s policy, the first since midterm elections in which public opposition to the war helped install a new Democratic majority.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

One day after critics of Bush’s revised war strategy merged two competing Senate measures, the White House worked to hold down the number of GOP defections while two liberal Democrats attacked the compromise as too weak. An early test vote on the issue is tentatively set for Monday.

“It is essentially an endorsement of the status quo, an endorsement I simply cannot make in light of the dire circumstances in Iraq and the need for meaningful action now,” said Sen. Christopher Dodd of Connecticut, who is seeking the 2008 Democratic presidential nomination.

Sharp words from McCain
Casey endured occasional sharp criticism as he appeared before the Senate Armed Services Committee.

“I do not in any way question your honor, your patriotism or your service to our country, I do question some of the decisions and judgments you have made over the past two and a half years as commander of Multi-National Forces in Iraq,” said Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz. “During that time, things have gotten markedly and progressively worse, and the situation in Iraq can now best be described as dire and deteriorating.”

So far, no senators have announced plans to oppose Casey’s elevation to chief of staff, although McCain, as well as Sens. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C. and Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., said they were undecided how to vote.

In the peculiar politics surrounding the Iraq war, the three lawmakers are among the strongest critics of the nonbinding legislation. It would criticize the president’s decision to increase troop levels as a way of stabilizing Baghdad nearly four years after Saddam Hussein was forced from power.

They said they intend to advance an alternative measure setting out the goals that should be met by the Iraqi government, and pledging whatever resources Petraeus requests. “We’ve come to the conclusion that the Petraeus strategy ... to buy some time for political reconciliation is our best chance for victory,” said Graham.

Critics of the war, including most Senate Democrats and several Republicans, appeared to be coalescing around a revised measure advanced by Sen. John Warner, R-Va., and a group of lawmakers of both parties. It says the Senate “disagrees with the ‘plan’ to augment our forces by 21,500, and urges the president instead to consider all options and alternatives.”

Many Democrats had been supporters of a stronger measure, one declaring that Bush’s plan for more troops was “not in the national interest.”

That criticism was jettisoned Wednesday night as Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada maneuvered to pick up Republican votes. Additionally, the new measure says Congress “should not take any action that will endanger United States military forces in the field, including the elimination or reduction of funds for troops in the field,” a provision that Republicans said was designed to outflank Democrats eager to rein in Bush’s policy.


Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Top Online Schools
Find the perfect online school and Boost your Career! Free Info Pack.
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide