Analysts question Bush fuel economy plan

Roland Jones Business news editor • Profile • E-mail

For a leader often vilified for his position on the environment, President Bush’s new plan to reform fuel economy standards for cars smacks of a president gone “green.”

In his State of the Union address to Congress last week, Bush asked for authority to reform the fuel economy program for passenger cars. The proposal is part of a broader plan to curb gasoline consumption by 20 percent over the next decade, using a combination of improved mileage and greater dependence on alternative fuels like ethanol.

The plan certainly sounds green, but not everyone is convinced. Many environmentalists are skeptical that Congress will enact the legislation needed to raise corporate average fuel economy standards.

The so-called CAFE standards for passenger cars have remained unchanged for two decades at 27.5 miles per gallon. The Bush administration recently revamped the rules for light trucks, creating a sliding mileage scale that is based on a vehicle’s size.

Now Bush wants to assign a similar measure to passenger cars. Instead of requiring companies to meet an average standard, fuel economy targets would be assigned model by model depending on aspects like size and weight.

The secretary of transportation would ultimately decide on fuel economy standards, Bush said, but to meet the new goal fuel economy standards for cars and light trucks would have to be raised by an estimated 4 percent annually, beginning for passenger cars with the 2010 model year and for light trucks with the 2012 model year.

Bush’s ambitious targets for improving mileage is welcome, said John DeCicco, senior fellow for automotive strategies at Environmental Defense, a not-for-profit group that focuses on environmental problems.

“We certainly praise him elevating the discussion about this issue,” DeCicco said. “Our view is that, on the face of it, this target is a very good first step, but further action will be necessary from the White House and Congress, and they’ll have to work together to make this work. It’s not clear how vigorously both sides will pursue that goal.”

DeCicco says that without legislation to limit the use of fuels like gasoline with high carbon content, he is skeptical the Bush plan will be implemented. Twenty years ago, similar legislation under President George H.W. Bush called for a 10 percent reduction in U.S. oil dependency by 2000 and a 30 percent reduction by 2010. Those levels were not met, he said.

“There have been lots of alternative fuel promises and promotions over the years, and in its totality all this activity has not made a measurable dent in U.S. oil consumption,” he said. “So while the proposal put forward in the president’s speech was good, having piecemeal targets without an overall policy is failing the country and has been for 20 years. If these policies don’t result in a binding law, then they’ll remain rhetoric.”

Curbing gas consumption by 20 percent over the next decade would mean a fuel economy standard of 34 miles per gallon by 2017 and could be the “the breakthrough we have been waiting for on fuel economy” said David Friedman, research director for the Union of Concerned Scientists, a not-for-profit advocacy organization.

MORE FROM THE DRIVER'S SEAT

The Driver's Seat Section Front

New small cars might struggle in market Auto industry turns to Europe for direction Pontiac hits end of the road Nissan hatches plan to boost battery cars At GM, down looks like up, at least for now Automakers turn to safety to sell cars CEO lays out ambitious Chrysler road map Plug-ins rev up; are consumers ready? As Toyota tips, VW steers for the top Battle of the ultrapremium automakers The Driver's Seat Section Front   Add The Driver's Seat headlines to your news reader: