Nuclear industry off the hook on air attacks

updated 6:49 p.m. ET Jan. 29, 2007

WASHINGTON - The Nuclear Regulatory Commission said Monday that nuclear power plant operators should not be expected to make reactors crash-proof to an airliner attack by terrorists and that stopping any such attack is the military's responsibility.

In a revised security policy, the federal agency directed nuclear plant operators to focus instead on preventing radiation from escaping in case of such an attack and to improve evacuation plans to protect public health and safety.

“The active protection against airborne threats is addressed by other federal organizations, including the military,” the NRC said in a statement.

The agency rejected calls by some nuclear watchdog groups that the government establish firm no-fly zones near reactors or that plant operators build “lattice-like” barriers to protect reactors, or be required to have anti-aircraft weapons on site to shoot down an incoming plane.

The NRC, in a summary of the mostly secret security plan, said such proposals were examined, but that it was concluded the “active protection” against an airborne threat rests with organizations such as the military or the Federal Aviation Administration.

It said that various mitigation strategies required of plant operators — such as radiation protection measures and evacuation plans — “are sufficient to ensure adequate protection of the public health and safety” in case of an airborne attack.

Day 1: Industry on verge of rebound? Day 2: The nuclear renaissance man Day 3: Reality check for cartel plan Day 4: The French connection Day 5: Do 'nukeonomics' make sense?

The commission unanimously approved the plan, which has been the subject of internal discussions for 15 months, in a 5-0 vote at a brief meeting without discussion.

“This rule is an important piece, but only one piece of a broader effort to enhance nuclear power plant security,” NRC Chairman Dale Klein said in a statement.

The defense plan, formally known as the Design Basis Threat, spells out what type of attack force the government believes might target a commercial power reactor and what its operator must be capable of defending against.

Plan assumes small force
While details are sketchy because of security concerns, the plan requires defense against a relatively small force, perhaps no more than a half-dozen attackers, but that they could come from multiple directions including by water and could include suicide teams.

The plan, which formally approves many of the procedures that have long been in place, reflects the increased concerns raised by the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. It also includes measures to address cyber attacks, according to the NRC.

Some members of Congress and nuclear watchdog groups have argued that the requirements fall short of what is needed, given what was learned by the Sept. 11 attacks on the twin towers in New York and at the Pentagon.

MORE FROM SECURITY

Security Section Front

Israel introduces step-on scanner FBI releases files on Jack Anderson Report: NSA spied on soldiers' personal calls Court blocks order to free Gitmo detainees No credible intel predicting terrror attack Documents say U.S. detainee near insanity Security Section Front   Add Security headlines to your news reader: