Skip navigation
sponsored by 

‘Idol’ judges aren't meaner, it's the editors

Locked doors, silent stares from Seacrest torture the terrible singers

Michael Becker / FOX-TV
Ian Bernardo put his name on his shirt, but it didn't help him win an "American Idol" golden ticket.
COMMENTARY
By Andy Dehnart
MSNBC contributor
updated 9:34 a.m. ET Jan. 31, 2007

“American Idol” has received a substantial amount of criticism in its first two weeks about the level of cruelty in its auditions. But as anyone who has actually watched the show over the past few years knows, this criticism is not exactly fair.

The show and its judges have never been nice to those who cannot sing. That is largely the reason for its success; watching Simon Cowell berate poor singers in advertisements back in the summer of 2002 first drew viewers in, and the show’s audience has done nothing but grow since then. And the audition round is nothing compared to the way “American Idol” tortures its finalists.

If anything, the judges seem somewhat kinder this year. It’s the editing that’s being especially cruel to those who audition.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

Simon Cowell admitted this, for the most part, after the first audition in New York City. “This was a very hammy, bad audition,” Simon told a contestant who was obviously there only to be on television. The contestant was wearing a shirt with his name on it, and we were informed that he was previously rejected from “So You Think You Can Dance.” On both shows, he gave a similarly affected audition.

FREE VIDEO
‘Idol’ lies
Jan. 30: Does "America Idol" use editing to give a false impression of the show?

Scarborough_Country

After he finished performing, Randy Jackson stared at him and said, “Are you real? Are you real? Is this real?”

Later, Simon told him, “It’s not funny; you’re not good at anything. ... It’s just rubbish. ... You’re doing this shtick, do it outside. I’m bored with you. ... Mike, take Mr. Boring out.”

Besides the judges actually saying they’re bored, the show included footage of them all yawning, exhausted from the parade of camera-hungry nitwits. At other moments, too, they reveal their feelings. Watch Randy Jackson carefully: Sometimes he looks to his right, our left, toward the crew and the show’s producers, clearly exasperated. The look on his face says, “Producers, you don’t pay me enough to sit through this. Oh, maybe you do.”

Paula Abdul actually gets critical
However, there’s even more damning evidence that the judges have had enough of sitting in hotel ballrooms listening to bad singers hand-picked from the thousands who show up in each city. The proof: Paula Abdul has offered actual negative criticism, saying “no” rather than just hiding her head. She even told one New York auditioner, “You need a lot of work with your singing. A lot of work. Vocally, you are completely all over the place and having a tough time.”

Paula also is not working very hard to seem supportive this year; she’s actually laughed at some contestants, and when one called her on that, Paula meekly and unconvincingly replied, “I’m laughing with you, sweetheart.”

Of course, there have been moments when Simon Cowell has unnecessarily and cruelly commented on a contestants’ weight or appearance, or made an offensive comment about something the person has no control over. For example, Simon told one male whose singing voice sounded feminine, “The reality is that you should be singing in a dress and stilettos. And I’m not being rude.” It’s this kind of statement that prompted one newspaper to turn the tables and write about Simon’s “totally disgusting man boobs” and “short, misshapen” body.

Simon’s rude comments, however, have paled in comparison to what the editing is doing to the contestants. The editing of the show is nearly transparent, but its impact is dramatic.

Consider, for a moment, how many rejected contestants have been shown encountering a locked door as they tried to exit the room.

They push hard, and the judges say, “Other door,” as if that wasn’t obvious. Viewers have watched far fewer successful contestants leaving the room; instead, they’re usually shown from the hallway, as they jump into the arms of waiting friends and family.

Including footage of those rejected contestants struggling with the locked door sends a clear message: They’re such failures, they can’t even open a door. Let’s laugh at them even more, and hope that makes us feel better about our own insecurities and inadequacies.

Of course, the editors aren’t alone to blame for this; someone likely made a conscious decision to lock that left-hand door, as it’s been locked in every city they’ve visited so far. Perhaps next year they’ll put a rabid cheetah behind the wrong exit door.

The editors have also included a lot of excruciatingly awkward footage, which helps to further eviscerate those who’ve already been rejected by the judges. Even better for “American Idol,” the show, and its host Ryan Seacrest, accomplish this in such a way that it appears that these contestants are bringing the misery upon themselves.

The camera lingers on those who’ve been rejected. Not the fun ones, the people who are clearly auditioning to be on TV, but the ones who are truly crushed.


  MORE FROM AMERICAN IDOL  
  
New judge will instantly improve ‘Idol’
 
Add American Idol headlines to your news reader:
 

Sponsored links

Resource guide

Get Your 2008 Credit Score

Race the World. 8/31/08

Find a business to start

Movies delivered - Try free

Search Jobs

Find Your Dream Home

$7 trades, no fee IRAs

Find your next car