Judge dismisses New York Times libel suit

updated 6:58 p.m. ET Jan. 12, 2007

McLEAN, Va. - A federal judge on Friday dismissed a libel lawsuit filed against The New York Times by a former Army scientist once identified as a person of interest in the 2001 anthrax attacks.

U.S. District Judge Claude Hilton in Alexandria dismissed the case a week after lawyers for the Times argued that Steven Hatfill should be considered a public figure under libel law, which makes it much more difficult for a public figure to win a judgment than a private citizen.

The judge did not explain his ruling in the order issued Friday.

Hatfill had claimed that a series of columns falsely implicated him as the culprit in the anthrax attacks.

His lawyers had argued that even if Hatfill qualified as a public figure, they could still prevail at trial because they had uncovered serious flaws in the reporting of columnist Nicholas Kristof.

Times lawyers argued that Hatfill qualifies as a public figure because he had injected himself into the national debate about bioterrorism years before the anthrax attacks. He had occasionally been quoted as an expert in the media, and even once donned a chemical suit for a magazine photo.

Times spokeswoman Catherine Mathis said the paper was pleased with the ruling. Hatfill’s lawyers could not immediately be reached for comment Friday evening.

This is the second time that Hilton has tossed out Hatfill’s claim against the paper. Hilton dismissed the case back in 2004 after ruling that Kristof’s columns accurately reflected the state of the FBI’s investigation, in which Attorney General John Ashcroft labeled Hatfill a “person of interest.”

But the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Richmond narrowly overturned Hilton’s ruling in 2005, determining that a reader of Kristof’s columns could reasonably infer that Hatfill was the anthrax killer.

Kristof said all along that he never intended to accuse Hatfill but simply wanted to prod a dawdling FBI investigation. He initially referred to Hatfill in his columns only as “Mr. X,” and identified him by name only after Hatfill held a news conference to denounce rumors that had been swirling around him.

Hatfill argued that the columns contained enough information about him that people could deduce his identity.

Hatfill is also suing former Attorney General John Ashcroft, the Justice Department and others, claiming they violated his civil rights.

Five people were killed and 17 sickened by anthrax that had been mailed to lawmakers on Capitol Hill and members of the news media in New York and Florida just weeks after the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. The case remains unsolved.

MORE FROM LIFE

Life Section Front

Pearl Harbor memories still vivid for some Springsteen, De Niro among Kennedy honorees Men, horses killed in barn fire mourned Once shy, she makes kids’ dreams come true Health reform hits doctor deficit reality Church selling Tiffany window to survive 1 dead, scores injured in Wyoming bus crash 15-year-old Wis. cheddar sells for $50 per pound U.S., Cuba spar over embargo's impact Abortion doctor to expand practice Life Section Front   Add Life headlines to your news reader: