For U.S. charities, a crisis of trust

Sharon Hoffman Senior Producer • Profile • E-mail

Americans’ charitable spirit peaks during the holiday season, but this year the urge to give is battling a strong contrarian tide – a crisis of trust born from public disenchantment with a philanthropic system that many consider disorganized, under-regulated and tainted by scandal.

A poll by Harris Interactive released this summer found only one in 10 Americans strongly believes charities are "honest and ethical" in their use of donated funds. And nearly one in three believes nonprofits have "pretty seriously gotten off in the wrong direction," it found.

"The public believed we would make things better," said Robert Egger, founder of the D.C. Central Kitchen food recycling and distribution center, speaking of the broad charitable sector. "Now they’re saying, ‘I’ve been giving for 40 years. … We’ve invested huge amounts of coin and soul into this sector; what are (we) getting in return?’ What they get is more and more dire predictions, more people asking for help."

The doubts matter, because average Americans are just as critical to the health of U.S. philanthropy as Warren Buffett and Bill Gates.

ABOUT THIS SERIES Give and Take Our continuing Give and Take coverage will document both the good and the ugly in the world of charity. We’ll present stories of good people making a difference, in hopes they will inspire you to do the same, and investigate charities to make sure they’re spending money wisely. We’ll explain the rules and anticipate trends. We want to become a clearinghouse for information, a forum for discussion, a first stop for readers and viewers who want to give money or donate items or services or time but don’t know where to start. We hope you’ll find this page engaging and useful, and we’re eager for your feedback.

Americans, both individuals and corporations, gave $260 billion to nonprofit organizations last year, according to the National Center for Charitable Statistics’ Nonprofit Almanac 2007, highlights of which were released last week.

Individuals and households accounted for $199 billion of the total — giving away nearly 2 percent of their incomes on average, it said.

Similarly, recent surveys by the Center on Philanthropy at Indiana University found that people making less than $50,000 a year make most of the donations to U.S. charities and that the median gift after major disasters is $50 – the kind of donation that comes from cookie jars rather than bank vaults.

Can the wealthy do it better?
It was partly that lack of general confidence that inspired celebrity philanthropists this year to pledge eye-popping amounts to charities — from Buffett’s $30 billion plus to the Gates Foundation, to Richard Branson’s $3 billion for global warming and Google’s billion dollars for big-problem solving. All champion the view that well-funded and well-run private charities can help reassure contributors by running philanthropies like their businesses.

Many veterans of the philanthropy sector applaud their initiative, but they argue that those gifts fail to address the underlying sources of the public’s eroding confidence – abuse of trust, lack of accountability and, sometimes, a lack of concrete results.

Give and Take Scandal, controversy Read about some notable cases of financial wrongdoing, ethical violations involving charities.

"United Way, the Nature Conservancy, Rick Santorum’s foundation – those things all add up," said Rick Cohen, former director of the National Committee for Responsive Philanthropy, referring to charity scandals that linger in the public’s mind. "They chip away at the public’s sense of trust."

Kevin McCarthy, CEO of the United Way of Inland Valley in California, argues that the perception that financial shenanigans are widespread is at least partly due to skewed media coverage and selective memory, noting that he still hears regularly about the 1992 scandal surrounding United Way CEO William Aramony.

"We still hear about the Red Cross charging for donuts in World War II," he said. "The thing about those stories is that … they remember the sensationalism but not the facts. ... What Aramony did didn’t affect the local groups. He and two other people plundered from shell organizations. But nobody ever hears that. You just hear, ‘Oh, you guys couldn’t keep your own house clean.’"

Possible misconceptions aside, Congress has grown increasingly concerned over abuse of nonprofits’ tax-exempt status – in some cases by lawmakers themselves – and attempted to crack down on such practices.

"Americans are very generous with their donations," Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, the soon-to-be former chairman of the Senate Finance Committee, said following Senate passage of the Pension Protection Act of 2006 in August. "They deserve to know that their money helps the needy, not the greedy."

Will tighter restrictions work?
Among other things, the act, which will take effect early next year, targets the practice of taking overly generous deductions for donated items; requires nonprofits to disclose unrelated business income and pay taxes on it; and adds new reporting requirements for the smallest nonprofits.

But Marion Fremont-Smith, a senior research fellow at Harvard’s Hauser Center for Nonprofit Organizations, said reforms will accomplish little unless they are accompanied by more aggressive enforcement.

"If we’re going to rely on the IRS, we have to give them more funds to do it," she said. "They’re absolutely overwhelmed. … The people there have been on hiring freezes for years. There’s plenty of good law there … (and) I think if people felt there were audits and more effective enforcement, there’d be fewer bad actors and certainly more confidence."

While Congress has not provided additional enforcement funding, Grassley has pressed the IRS to step up enforcement against abuse of tax-exempt status, particularly the creation of nonprofit groups to receive federal grants and engage in political activity.

The IRS did not respond to a call seeking comment on whether the agency plans to aggressively target such abuse, but it issued a memo in February warning churches and other nonprofits against "directly or indirectly participating in, or intervening in, any political campaign on behalf of (or in opposition to) any candidate for elective public office."

The agency said any nonprofit engaging in such activity would risk losing its tax-exempt status.

While the erosion of public trust is a concern across the philanthropic spectrum, smaller charities are simultaneously facing another new challenge: An increasingly confusing array of charitable choices.

MORE FROM GIVING

Giving Section Front

Newsweek: First lady reaches out to D.C.’s poor Willie Garson touts adoptions in U.S. Mich.-based charity shuts down Obama lauds community nonprofits Obama: All Americans should give back Dina Manzo reaches out to kids with cancer Michelle Obama calls on Americans to serve Foundation gives $1.6M for volunteer plan Giving Section Front   Add Giving headlines to your news reader: