Skip navigation

Judge dismisses Britney Spears’ libel suit

Pop star had accused US Weekly of fabricating story about sex video

Slide show
Image: Britney Spears
The Spears years
Britney’s life, from Mickey Mouse to motherhood, divorce drama and more.

more photos

Kevork Djansezian / AP
Britney Spears performs "Gimme More," at the MTV Video Music Awards at the Palms Hotel and Casino on Sunday, Sept. 9, 2007, in Las Vegas.. (AP Photo/Kevork Djansezian)
  Celebrity video
Fans walk out on Spears in Australia
  Nov. 7: It took Australian fans of Britney Spears only three songs to desert the pop diva after it became evident she was lip-synching. Msnbc's Alex Witt reports.

Slideshow
Image: Elizabeth Hurley
  Best and worst celebrity fashions of 2009
From glamorous gowns to stylish suits to complete fashion failures, a look at the year so far.

more photos

updated 9:33 a.m. ET Nov. 7, 2006

LOS ANGELES - A judge has thrown out Britney Spears’ lawsuit against celebrity magazine Us Weekly, ruling the pop star cannot be defamed by published rumors that she and her husband had made a sex tape and were worried about its release.

Superior Court Judge Lisa Hart Cole said Spears has “put her modern sexuality squarely, and profitably, before the public eye” and it would be unlikely for the magazine article to be found defamatory.

Her decision to dismiss the $10 million lawsuit filed last year did not address whether the October 2005 story was true or false.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

“The issue is whether it is defamatory to state that a husband and wife taped themselves engaging in consensual sex,” Cole wrote in the decision issued last week. “The backdrop against which this issue must be addressed is that the plaintiff has publicly portrayed herself in a sexual way in her performances, in published photographs and in a reality show.”

Spears’ lawyer, Martin Singer, did not return a call Monday seeking comment.

Us said in a statement it stood by its reporting and was pleased with the decision.

The lawsuit stemmed from an article published Oct. 17, 2005, in the magazine’s “Hot Stuff” column under the headline, “Brit & Kev: Secret Sex Tape? New parents have a new worry: racy footage from 2004.”

It claimed Spears and her husband, Kevin Federline, feared the release of a secret sex tape, which they had viewed with their estate planning lawyers. The article said that Spears gave a copy of the tape to lawyers on Sept. 30 and she and Federline were “acting goofy the whole time” while watching the video.

“There was no laughter, disgust or goofy behavior while watching the video in the company of lawyers because they did not watch any video, and because there is no such video,” the lawsuit said.

Spears sued after Us refused to issue a retraction.

Spears, 24, married Federline, 28, in 2004. They have a 1-year-old son, Sean Preston, and an infant son, who was born Sept.

12. The couple have not confirmed the infant’s name, which is reportedly Jayden James.

Federline has two children from a previous relationship.

© 2009 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

Sponsored links

Resource guide