You might be a supervisor and not even know it

Eve Tahmincioglu • Profile • E-mail

With the country facing a nursing shortage you would think government and employers would be doing everything they could to make the profession as appealing as possible.

So I’m still scratching my head over a set of rulings by the National Labor Relations Board to limit the number of nurses covered by collective bargaining laws, basically limiting their right to unionize.

Last month the NLRB released new guidelines expanding the definition of who is a supervisor. If you’re deemed a supervisor, you’re not covered by the 70-year-old National Labor Relations Act, which protects the collective bargaining rights of working stiffs.

The initial case that sparked the new rules involved a suit brought by management of a suburban Detroit hospital claiming that many of its nurses were effectively supervisors and thus not protected if they chose to unionize.

The NLRB agreed, finding that a group of charge nurses at the hospital were indeed supervisors even though they did not have the authority to hire or fire employees. The thinking behind the  the so-called Kentucky River rulings was that the nurses had the “regular” duty of assigning other hospital staff to specific patients, even though these nurses also were taking care of patients themselves. (The decision by the five-member board was split along party lines, with the three Republican board members voting for the change, and the two Democrats dissenting.)

This decision worries workers like Vicki Neumeier, a registered nurse in Seattle and active member of the Nurse Alliance of Washington union. She remembers how a charge nurse she worked with a few years back became the ringleader for a group trying to cope with insufficient nurse staffing in the ICU on a particular night. The shift supervisor of the hospital, she recalls, refused to call for additional staffing, so the charge nurse rallied the nurses on the shift to refuse to work until more nurses were brought in.

“This is an example of why a charge nurse in a union is able to speak up for the patients and the nurses in a collective voice,” she says.

The ruling won’t just affect nurses. Many labor experts anticipate employers will see the NLRB decision as an opening to designate workers in many professions as de facto bosses.

Union groups maintain as many as 8 million workers could lose their right to unionize.
Employer advocates contend the ruling is just a blip on the screen of union organizing and will have little effect on the rank and file.

The bottom line is no one really knows how far-reaching the new standard will be and whether it will further derail the struggling U.S. labor movement.

Just because the NLRB issued the ruling doesn’t mean employers around the country will rush to designate more of their workers as supervisors. Indeed, some companies have allowed union votes since the ruling even though some of workers could have been classified as supervisors under the new rules. And nothing precludes the newly minted supervisors from organizing anyway. But they won’t have legal protection if their bosses decide to fire them as a result — a risk few employees would be willing to take.

If you look at the NLRB’s ruling, the definition of who is a supervisor goes far beyond the old standard of hiring and firing. Assigning work and independent judgment now gain new importance.

MORE FROM CAREERS

Careers Section Front

Your Career: Take this job and shove it! Asking God for peace, and help in job search Older job seekers struggling with age barrier Your Career: Getting paid to lose weight Life of a star: Go to a party, and get paid for it Your career: Empathy matters at work Posting dilemmas when your status is ‘Jobless’ Supreme Court tightens age bias suit rules Need work? These jobs have a lot of openings British Airways asks for work without pay Careers Section Front   Add Careers headlines to your news reader: