Keep hope alive, Bush says about Iraq, election
Tells Americans they can't let dissatisfaction turn into disillusionment
![]() | President Bush speaks during a news conference in the East Room of the White House on Wednesday. |
Gerald Herbert / AP |
Interactive |
Although Iraqi lives and American national security are at stake in what’s happening on the streets of Baghdad, there also happens to be a midterm election in less than two weeks, so Bush’s words have Election Day resonance.
“We cannot allow our dissatisfaction to turn into disillusionment about our purpose in this war,” the president warned. “We must not fall prey to the sophisticated propaganda by the enemy who is trying to undermine our confidence and make us believe that our presence in Iraq is the cause of all its problems.”
But Bush and Republican candidates on Nov. 7 must also grapple with another question: Even if the American presence in Iraq isn’t the cause of all its problems, is the U.S. presence there doing any measurable good?
Unease in GOP ranks
Bush is battling not only the insurgents, but those in the ranks of his own party who, on the brink of the election, voice something close to despondency about the Iraq muddle.
|
“We’re on the verge of chaos, and the current plan is not working,” Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said Monday.
But the current Iraqi government has Bush and his Republican supporters in a kind of political hostage dilemma. The president has made the judgment that he can not pull U.S. troops from Iraq any time soon, for fear of ceding the country to terrorists.
Nor can Bush replace Iraqi Prime minister Nuri al-Maliki and his colleagues in hopes of finding a more vigorous government.
A primary point of the Iraq operation is that the infant democracy is intended to be a model for the Arab world, a replacement for autocratic regimes that, according to Bush, bred terrorists like Mohammad Atta.
“Above and beyond toppling the regime of Saddam Hussein and dismantling its deadly weapons, the driving motivation of a new American endeavor in Iraq and in neighboring Arab lands should be modernizing the Arab world,” said Johns Hopkins University Arab expert Fouad Ajami in January of 2003, shortly before Bush ordered the invasion.
Ajami was a prominent invasion supporter, telling the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in July of 2002 that once the United States troops got to Basra and Baghdad, “we shall be mobbed when we go there by people who are eager for deliverance from the tyranny and the great big prison of Saddam Hussein.”
The Iraqis have been delivered from that prison, but now are free to wreak assassination and revenge on each other.
Bush backs Maliki
Unfortunately for Bush, Maliki’s government is not yet capable of stopping that violence. Bush said Wednesday, “I do believe Prime Minister Maliki is the right man to achieve the goal in Iraq.” He added, “I like his spirit, I like his attitude.”
|
But one reporter asked a question Bush never explicitly answered: What if Maliki doesn’t meet the benchmarks for imposing order and creating national unity?
The president did say, “Americans have no intention of taking sides in a sectarian struggle or standing in the cross fire between rival factions.”
He reported that, “we’re pressing Iraq’s leaders to take bold measures to save their country. We're making it clear that America’s patience is not unlimited.”
But he tempered that warning by saying “We will not put more pressure on the Iraqi government than it can bear.”
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
-
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
Sponsored links
Resource guide






