Skip navigation

Red Cross concerned with interrogation law

International group says U.S. definition of enemy combatant too broad

Video: Security  
Cheney: Congress Playing Politics With CIA
July 14: Former State Department Official Liz Cheney discusses the recently revealed CIA program and whether it is wise for Congress to pursue an investigation, but did not comment on whether her father, while in office, instructed the CIA to keep Congress in the dark.

Text alerts on msnbc.com

Breaking news alerts (about 1 per day)
Click here to sign up or text NEWS to MSNBC (67622).

Find more alerts at alerts.msnbc.com

updated 7:57 p.m. ET Oct. 19, 2006

GENEVA - The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) expressed concern on Thursday at a new U.S. law allowing tough CIA interrogation techniques and military trials for terrorism suspects.

In an interview on its Web site, ICRC President Jakob Kellenberger said the law was too vague about which detainees could be covered and did not explicitly exclude the use of evidence extracted by force in trials.

The Military Commissions Act of 2006, signed by President George W. Bush on Tuesday, could also weaken basic guarantees given under the Geneva Conventions which are supposed to protect everybody from humiliating and degrading treatment, he said.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

“Our preliminary reading of the new legislation raises certain concerns and questions,” Kellenberger said.

“The very broad definition of who is an ’unlawful enemy combatant’ and the fact that there is not an explicit prohibition on the admission of evidence attained by coercion are examples,” he said.

Bush says the law will enable the United States to bring to trial some of those believed to be behind the Sept. 11 attacks.

It also means that Washington can continue a secret CIA program for interrogating terrorism suspects whom Bush argues could have vital information needed to thwart future plots against the United States.

But human rights groups charge that the measure, likely to face legal challenges that go up as far as the Supreme Court, would allow harsh techniques bordering on torture, such as sleep deprivation and induced hypothermia.

The White House has refused to describe what techniques will be allowed. Bush insisted “the United States does not torture”.

Copyright 2009 Reuters. Click for restrictions.

Sponsored LinksGet listed here
Online College Courses
Boost your career with an online Degree. Pick from Leading Colleges!
www.EarnMyDegree.com

Sponsored links

Resource guide