Skip navigation

Voting for Robin Williams — sometimes

In defense of his half a dozen or so decent movies

Robin Williams
Admit it: You're just a little glad that this photo of Robin Williams can't speak.
Mario Anzuoni / Reuters
COMMENTARY
By Dave White
msnbc.com contributor
updated 11:52 p.m. ET Oct. 11, 2006

Here’s something not to do: watching lots of Robin Williams movies back to back to back, trying to sort through the good from the bad. The scale tips way over to the “you’re screwed” side of that balance, and by the time you’re finished you’ll have the man leaping around your brain. And that’s what he’s doing to me right now. He’s in there, waving his arms, howling like a werewolf, kicking the inside of my skull, snorting a Tony Montana-sized pile of cocaine. And then riffing on it. In old lady make-up and a fat suit.

To top off this marathon of soul-crippling cinema, I went to see his new film “Man of the Year.” And wow. It’s crap. Like monumentally unfunny, confused and inept crap. The kind of steaming pile of comedy failure that makes me feel like I just spent two hours in movie jail, that infuriated me enough to shoot the finger at the three “Man Of The Year” billboards I had to drive past on my way home from the screening, that made me want to climb up there with a can of Krylon and word-bubble something like “Rehab here I come!” shooting out of Robin Williams’s bewigged head. I’m too old, of course, to start a new career as a tagger. But there’s the idea, kids, so start your engines. Be creative.

Now, any reasonably thoughtful movie fan who’s endured more than a few Robin Williams films can tell you that he seems to pick scripts that showcase his natural tendency toward two types of deplorable on-screen behavior: manic impishness, a trait that’s aged into a by-the-numbers “wacky characters” schtick he can bust out on talk show couches so the hosts can fake-laugh to it; and crinkly eyed sentimentality so pillowy soft it makes you wish he was going mental and being the wacky characters instead. I already knew all this, but I went ahead and watched a lot of his movies anyway, just to get myself all wound up. “Toys,” “Insomnia,” even his Bizarro-mincing through Kenneth Branagh’s four-hour “Hamlet.”

Story continues below ↓
advertisement | your ad here

And what I’ve decided is that bashing him is like playing T-Ball with a five year-old. Not that it ain’t fun to be able to top a friend’s story of unwittingly buying a ticket to “Bicentennial Man” with battle-scarred comments like, “Oh yeah? Well I saw ‘Jack’ AND ‘Jakob The Liar’ AND ‘Patch Adams,’” and then enjoying the sight as they recoil in disgust. But what about when watching a Robin Williams movie isn’t agony?

It happens sometimes, you know.

When he’s actually good
I’m not talking about when he shows up for two minutes in a film that otherwise has nothing to do with him, no matter how entertaining his two minutes may be. As the Out Of Focus Guy in Woody Allen’s “Deconstructing Harry,” Williams just had to stand there and be a clever special effect.  His cameo in the ’90s thriller “Dead Again” was essentially the same thing, a moment for you to sit in the theater and go, “Oh hey, it’s Robin Williams. I didn’t know he was in this.”

And I’m really not talking about “Aladdin,” “Mrs. Doubtfire,” “Dead Poets Society” or “Good Morning Vietnam.” I know millions of people love those movies. But I’m not one of those people. And, yes, he was nominated for Academy Awards for the last two. But those dopes will give a statue to anything. “Crash” did win best picture last year, remember.

I’m talking about anomalies like “Popeye,” the widely hated and unfondly remembered flop that earns an entire chapter in the excellently entertaining book by James Robert Parish, “Fiasco,” all about grand-scale Hollywood disasters. Robert Altman’s weirdest movie after “Three Women,” “Popeye” is out-of-control strange, a self-contained world of aggressive oddity, full of go-nowhere plotlines, musical numbers devoted to Bluto’s girth (“He’s Large”) and the crankiest demeanor ever slapped onto the face of a “family” film. It’s not a good movie, but it’s never not fascinating.

And it’s Williams re-routing of his own tics, hammering them into Popeye-shape, and abandoning himself into the iconic cartoon character that’s most interesting to witness. Apparently the prosthetic forearms caused him a lot of physical pain. Could that have been the key? Like when a smoker snaps a rubber band on their wrist when they want a cigarette? Or when the murderous drifter in Flannery O’Connor’s story “A Good Man is Hard to Find,” declares of his final annoying victim that she would have been a good woman if someone had been around to shoot her every minute of her life? I hate to wish pain on anyone, but maybe if that George Washington wig had been clamped down a little tighter…


Sponsored links

Resource guide