Skip navigation
sponsored by 

Does every school need a metal detector?

Experts say schools rely too much on physical security

Schools should focus more on listening to kids to deter school attacks, experts say, instead of relying only on physical security. Police Officer Jeff Tatum passes through a metal detector at Lew Wallace High School on March 30, 2001, in Gary, Ind., after 16-year-old sophomore Neal Boyd, Jr. was fatally shot outside the building.
Tim Boyle / Getty Images file
Video: Crime & courts  
Behind a comic-book murder mystery
  May 9: TODAY's Matt Lauer provides an update on a "Dateline" investigation into a mysterious comic book killing.

  Stand and be counted
Gut Check America

What keeps you up at night? Gut Check America wants you to tell us what really matters to our country. Click here to learn more and get involved.

  Photo features  
  More
Farmer inspects sunflower crop in field in Taragarh village, on outskirts of Amritsar
Reuters
  Week in Pictures
A crop outgrows the farmer, a cloud spins and sparks, and soldiers suffer in the sand
Image: University fire
AP
PhotoBlog
View and discuss the pictures and issues that caught our eyes.
By Bill Dedman
Investigative reporter
MSNBC
updated 7:43 p.m. ET Oct. 3, 2006

Bill Dedman
Investigative reporter

E-mail
Metal detectors, threat-evaluation software, police officers -- hundreds of American schools have added tighter security since 1999’s attack at Colorado’s Columbine High School.

But these solutions "are not likely to be effective," and are potentially harmful, according to federal researchers who conducted the most thorough study of school shootings across the nation.

Of what value is a metal detector, the researchers asked, when an attacker is willing to kill others and take his or her life?

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

Or threat-evaluation software, when most attackers do not make a threat before an attack?

Or a SWAT team, when most attacks last only a few minutes and end before police arrive?

Instead of relying solely on physical security, the researchers suggest, schools should be paying more attention to listening to students, discouraging and discovering attacks while they’re still in the planning stages.

After the nation’s third deadly school attack in a week, one of the researchers said Monday that he was ambivalent about encouraging every one of the 100,000 schools in the nation to add metal detectors.

“Because you’ve had three school shootings in this country, is that a reason to make sure that every school in the country has a metal detector?” said the researcher, William Modzeleski, director of the Safe and Drug-Free Schools Program for the U.S. Department of Education, which studied school shootings with researchers from the U.S. Secret Service. “Would it have stopped what happened?”

How else can schools prevent attacks?

The most detailed study of school shootings was done by the U.S. Secret Service and the U.S. Department of Education. The researchers studied 37 attacks, and interviewed 10 of the perpetrators, for their 2002 report.

Their advice? Schools should:

  • Encourage students to report what they hear, and to have an adult they can confide in, because attackers often disclose their plans to other students, but rarely to adults.
  • Watch for behavior such as gathering weapons or making plans, because attackers rarely “just snap” in a spur-of-the-moment attack.
Rate this story LowHigh
 • View Top Rated stories

Sponsored links

Resource guide

Search Jobs

Find your next car

Find Your Dream Home

Find a business to start

$7 trades, no fee IRAs