Requests for future tech more numerous
Some measure of technology’s limited impact since Sept. 11 can be gleaned from the Department of Homeland Security’s budget request for 2007.

DHS cited 25 “key accomplishments” in the three years since it corralled 22 federal agencies, but most of the victories surrounded organizational changes or improved use of resources.
Only three items linked technology to better Sept. 11-style safety. One celebrated the rise of a data-sharing network that routes secret information among 56 federal sites.

The other two related to a single program, US-VISIT, which incorporates biometrics and machine-readable passports to tighten border control. DHS touted this about the program: Of the 44 million foreign visitors it had processed, US-VISIT had detected 950 people with criminal histories or immigration violations.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here

Requests for future technology initiatives, meanwhile, were more numerous. For example, DHS sought $692 million for explosive detection devices, $157 million for radiation monitors and $5 million to upgrade the satellite capabilities of the emergency alert system.

“The themes around much of the successes involving technology have been relatively basic at this point,” said Greg Baroni, who heads the federal business for Unisys. “I see this as an emerging market. The large, advanced, state-of-the-art technologies are still being explored.”

Even this basic phase has been pivotal for Unisys. Before Sept. 11, Unisys’ federal business was so weak that the company was trying to sell it. Now the unit has doubled to nearly $1 billion a year, about $400 million of which comes from homeland security contracts. The group had 1,200 employees in 2001, but now has nearly 4,000.

Rush to market limits innovation
Helena Wisniewski has worked in homeland security from multiple angles: At the CIA, the Pentagon’s Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency, defense contractors and a biometrics company she founded. Now an administrator at the Stevens Institute of Technology, Wisniewski says innovations in the post-Sept. 11 tech market have been limited because of the pressures to get basic technologies in place quickly.

That environment also shoehorned some ideas into places they didn’t work. Witness the rush to use facial-recognition biometrics to scan crowds for evildoers, even though the access-control technology was built for settings where people present themselves one at a time under good lighting.

“It’s very difficult in a lot of circumstances to reduce a technology to practice in six months,” she said. “We haven’t really organized to sit back and look at an effective strategy for the longer term. I think we need an overall strategy, not just tactical solutions.”

Gartner’s Vining says the most successful security technologies so far have been improved communications systems and networks for information sharing. Police and intelligence agents have also benefited from new data-mining programs, he believes.

Several analysts expect the next wave to make more use of chemical, biological and radiological sensors, which figure to play a role in a $2 billion border security contract to be awarded shortly. Boeing Co., Lockheed Martin Corp., Northrop Grumman Corp., LM Ericsson and Raytheon Co. are seeking prime-contractor status on the deal.

Brian Ruttenbur, homeland security analyst for Morgan Keegan & Co., is also watching companies that help analyze intercepted communications and those that manage video surveillance.

Of course, even as technologies improve, none is likely to end the post-Sept. 11 era of hyper vigilance.

“We can’t catch everything,” Ruttenbur said. “I don’t know of any single technology that can be right 100 percent of the time.”

< Prev | 1 | 2

Discuss Story On Newsvine
Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh
Email
Instant Message
Print