Leaders see a nation changed, but not defeated
Some see advances; others see critical missteps, lost opportunities
‘Dante’s Inferno’ Video: Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., tells MSNBC’s Chris Matthews that Ground Zero was “as close to a visual depiction of hell as I've ever seen.” |
After five years, it’s clear that the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001, failed to alter America’s fundamental commitment to liberty and openness, say those tasked with steering the country through the aftermath of the terrorist strikes. But, they add, there’s no denying that the attacks changed the United States in ways big and small, forcing Americans to rethink their notions of a free society.
Osama bin Laden and his al-Qaida followers “killed some of our fellow citizens, and we’re mourning them,” said former Secretary of State Colin Powell. “They knocked down some of our structures, and we rebuilt them. But you didn’t win anything. We’re still here, and we’ll be here long after you’ve gone to hell.”
At the same time, the extended struggle with militant Islamic terrorism “has caused us to look more carefully at the freedoms we have, the privileges we enjoy and what, if any, of those freedoms and privileges we need [to] talk about adjusting and changing in order to combat this,” said Tom Ridge, President Bush’s first secretary of homeland security, a position that was created in response to the Sept. 11 attacks.
Powell and Ridge were among numerous current and former government officials closely involved in Bush’s “war on terror” who talked about the lessons of Sept. 11 in interviews with the MSNBC-TV program “Hardball.” The interviews are airing over several days around the fifth anniversary of the attacks, which killed more than 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania.
Related coverage |
Intelligence improvements called dramatic
If nothing else, Americans are significantly safer today than they were on Sept. 10, 2001, because of how the attacks forced the U.S. military and intelligence communities to change course, said John Negroponte, Bush’s director of national intelligence.
Like Ridge, Negroponte assumed a new job created expressly to address weaknesses exposed by the attacks. Before 9/11, the nation’s intelligence agencies were loosely coordinated, and a major theme of post-attack investigations was that the left hand didn’t know what the right hand was doing.
|
But now, there’s “much better cooperation in the key agencies — the FBI, the CIA, the National Security Agency,” he said. “They work as teams now. There’s teamwork all the way down to the local level, both in our country and abroad, between these agencies.”
The history of the last five years “completes the transition, if you will,” Negroponte said. “It’s a huge break from the Cold War. All of a sudden, terrorism, global terrorism, international terrorism — that transnational issue — moved to the front and center of our foreign and of our intelligence policy. So that’s the big shift.”
Acknowledging that “there’s no absolute guarantee,” Negroponte insisted: “We’ve certainly set up mechanisms — no-fly lists, databases, checking on names of people prior to their boarding flights and so forth — that put us in a better position to prevent these kinds of things than prior to 9/11.”
Progress overseas faulted
Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., who challenged Bush’s handling of 9/11 and the ensuing war in Iraq in the 2004 presidential race, agreed that changes in security and law enforcement policies had “changed certain aspects of day-to-day life, because you walk into a building and you’ve got tighter security; you go fly, you’ve got tighter security — in those ways it has changed us.”
But Kerry disputed that the country was any better off because of mistakes made in confronting the terrorist threat outside America’s borders.
“I think that there was a stunning opportunity afforded the president in ways that perhaps only Franklin Roosevelt and Harry Truman ... have had in American history, where the entire world was united to support us,” he said.
But Kerry and others harshly criticized Bush for having “squandered that support over the last five years.”
“I think we are making the world more dangerous,” Kerry said. “This administration is making the world more dangerous through its stubbornness, through its ideological rigidness, through its insistence that it is right and everybody else is wrong.”
- Discuss Story On Newsvine
- Rate Story:
View popularLowHigh - Instant Message
MORE FROM HARDBALL WITH CHRIS MATTHEWS |
| Add Hardball with Chris Matthews headlines to your news reader: |


