Court: Nader must pay for election suit

Implication of 'fraud and deception' in their petition drive

Matthew Cavanaugh / Getty Images file	Ralph Nader, independent candidate for president in 2004, has been handed a costly ruling by the Pennsylvania Supreme Court.

NBC Video: Politics

Religion’s role in health debate
Dec. 2: The fight over abortion in the health care debate is shedding light on the Catholic Church’s lobbying influence in the Senate. Is the Church crossing the line? Dr. Nancy Snyderman talks with a panel.

Paying for the war

U.S. leaning on allies for war help

Will the Democrats back Obama?

McCain questions Gates on Afghan timetable

NYS to vote on same-sex marriage

Like father, like son?

Cantor's seven economic solutions

Slideshow

The Week in Political Cartoons
Msnbc.com’s political cartoonists take a look back at the past week.

more photos

updated 3:01 p.m. ET Aug. 23, 2006

HARRISBURG, Pa. - Former presidential candidate Ralph Nader and his running mate must pay more than $80,000 in expenses for the lawsuit that challenged their nominating papers and kept them off the 2004 ballot, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruled Wednesday.

There was an implication of "fraud and deception" in their petition drive, the court said in its ruling.

A group of Pennsylvania voters sued to block Nader and Peter Camejo, who were running as independent candidates, from being placed on the ballot.

Story continues below ↓

advertisement | your ad here

As a result of the lawsuit, the state Commonwealth Court found wide-ranging improprieties among Nader and Camejo's petition signatures and disqualified nearly two-thirds of the 51,000 signatures they submitted.

In Wednesday's ruling, five justices said Nader and Camejo must pay the plaintiffs' transcription and stenography costs. A sixth justice said he did not think the law permitted the award of such costs, and the seventh said only about half of the bill was permissible.
Interactive
Analyzing the 2008 presidential field