Skip navigation
sponsored by 

Stem cell funding, a silver bullet for Democrats?

Senate passes federal funding measure 63-to-37

  FactBox: The stem cell funding bills
The bill passed by the House last year, as well as the one the Senate will vote on next week, permits federal funding for research if the stem cells are:
— derived from embryos donated by in vitro fertilization clinics;
— in excess of the need of the individuals seeking fertility treatment;
— otherwise going to be discarded;
— donated by individuals with their written informed consent and without any financial or other inducements.

The Senate will also vote on a bill to outlaw the donation of human fetal tissue if a pregnancy was deliberately initiated to provide such tissue and another bill to promote federally-funded research on the therapeutic potential of adult stem cells.

By Tom Curry
National affairs writer
MSNBC
updated 6:05 p.m. ET July 18, 2006

Tom Curry
National affairs writer

E-mail
WASHINGTON - Nancy Reagan supports federal funding of embryonic stem cell research. So does Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch of Utah. So do 50 House Republicans.

Last year the House passed a bill to permit federal funding.

But President Bush is against it. And after the Senate voted 63-to-37 Tuesday to pass a bill that allows federally funded research on stem cells taken from unused embryos at fertility clinics, the White House has vowed a veto.

Story continues below ↓
advertisement

“The president is not going to get on the slippery slope of taking something living and making it dead for the purposes of scientific research,” White House spokesman Tony Snow said Tuesday.

The House passed the funding bill last year by a vote of 238 to 194, well short of the two-thirds needed to over-ride a veto.

Some Democrats gleefully predict that the veto will boost their chances in November elections.

Electoral gains for Democrats?
Sen. Charles Schumer, D- N.Y., the head of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, said last week that surveys show significant voter movement to the Democrats due to the stem cell issue. Many scientists say that use of cells derived from embryos offers hope of finding treatments for Parkinson's disease and other ailments.

“Protestant non-evangelical Republicans” are shifting, Schumer said. “The elder in the Presbyterian church in the suburbs of Cincinnati,” Schumer said with precise specificity, naming his electoral target. “There’s a feeling among more affluent Republicans of uncomfortable-ness with where the Republican Party is headed.”

Such voters, Schumer said, “don’t like Schiavo,” a reference to congressional intervention last year in the case of the disabled Florida woman Terri Schiavo. “And they don’t like creationism being taught in the public schools, and they sure don’t like blocking stem cell research. It’s an issue that affects lots of swing voter Republicans who will move to the Democratic side…. When they know somebody who says, ‘My daughter could be blind by age 20, please allow stem cell research,’ they don’t see why not.”

Jonathan Collegio, a spokesman for the National Republican Congressional Committee, disputed Schumer, saying, federal funding of embryonic stem cell research "is not going to be a top-tier issue in any (House) campaign. For moderate Republican voters, this is not going to be a more salient issue than taxes or illegal immigration."

Bush says he opposes taxpayer funding because embryonic stem cell research entails the destruction of human life.

The administration policy is to permit taxpayer funding of research on stem cell lines created as of Aug. 9, 2001, or prior to that date, but no taxpayer funding for the use of stem cell lines derived from newly destroyed embryos after that date.

Advocates scrutinize the votes
Non-partisan advocacy groups took an active role prior to the Senate vote, and will remind the electorate in November how incumbents voted.

“We fully expect to hold accountable the politicians who oppose this,” said John Hlinko, founder of StemPac, an advocacy group which calls for federal funding of embryonic stem cell research.

The Senate voted Tuesday on two other bills, one to outlaw “fetal farming” or donation of fetal tissue if a pregnancy was initiated only to provide such tissue, and another to promote federally-funded research on the therapeutic potential of adult stem cells. Both those measures were passed unanimously.

Sen. Rick Santorum, R –Pa., who opposes the House-passed bill, co-sponsored the two alternatives and predicted that Bush will sign them into law.

But Sean Tipton, of a group called The Coalition for the Advancement of Medical Research, derided the adult stem cell bill as “clearly a political fig leaf.” He said, “Only a vote for H.R. 810, (the House-passed bill), is pro-patient and pro-research.”


Sponsored links

Resource guide

Get Your 2008 Credit Score

Save Money On Car Insurance

Find a business to start

Movies delivered - Try free

Search Jobs

Find Your Dream Home

$7 trades, no fee IRAs

Find your next car